Learning · Evidence record
Plan a Field-Research Notebook Students Can Actually Use — Completed Benchmark Result: 10/10
The completed LFT-058 synthetic field test reached 10/10 after one failure-only correction: 5 of five static checks passed for Field Research, while 0 checks remained unresolved.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
plan a field-research notebook for novice student observers
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-058: An instructor will provide a study question, site constraints, required measurements, consent boundaries, and available field time. Source facts: fictional calendar LFT-058-C1 covering 14 days; exam dates on days 9 and 14; available blocks of 25, 40, and 55 minutes; missed tasks M2/M4; prerequisite P1 before P3; and a maximum of 12 study blocks per day. Governing rule card: the 12-block daily ceiling and both fixed exam dates. Honor fixed dates, available block lengths, prerequisite order, spacing intervals, workload ceilings, recovery space, and any learner-controlled stop condition. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-058 for “plan a field-research notebook for novice student observers” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-058. Task: plan a field-research notebook for novice student observers. Context: An instructor will provide a study question, site constraints, required measurements, consent boundaries, and available field time. Fictional source facts: fictional calendar LFT-058-C1 covering 14 days; exam dates on days 9 and 14; available blocks of 25, 40, and 55 minutes; missed tasks M2/M4; prerequisite P1 before P3; and a maximum of 12 study blocks per day. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: the 12-block daily ceiling and both fixed exam dates. Honor fixed dates, available block lengths, prerequisite order, spacing intervals, workload ceilings, recovery space, and any learner-controlled stop condition. Produce a dated learning plan, constraint map, and recovery checkpoint. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A simulated field walk and completeness checklist will verify navigation, observation prompts, measurement capture, and ethics reminders.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response LFT-058 produced a dated learning plan, constraint map, and recovery checkpoint for the task “plan a field-research notebook for novice student observers.” It treated the supplied pack as fictional and proposed this central handling: move M2 to day 3, keep P1 before P3, protect the day-9 review, and leave one recovery block open rather than exceeding 12 daily sessions. Concrete saved artifact row LFT-058-ROW1 reads: “LFT-058-C1 | move M2 to day 3, keep P1 before P3, protect the day-9 review, and leave one recovery block open rather than exceeding 12 daily sessions | source: supplied fictional pack | review state: first-draft.” The draft preserved the named records and separated supplied facts from assumptions; its inspectable learning intervention also stated that no message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome had occurred. On the five predeclared static checks, it passed Field Research content accuracy [LFT-058], Field Research learner adaptation [LFT-058], and Field Research evidence traceability [LFT-058]. The audit found concrete failures: for Field Research objective fit [LFT-058], the saved draft did not connect LFT-058-M4 to the full boundary of “plan a field-research notebook for novice student observers”; for Field Research safety and access [LFT-058], the saved draft left the dated learning plan, constraint map, and recovery checkpoint without a complete reviewer handoff and acceptance marker. Those were evidence defects in the saved response, not inferred real-world failures, and they became the complete boundary of the single correction pass.Initial score: 6/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected LFT-058 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Field Research objective fit [LFT-058] — the draft did not connect LFT-058-M4 to the full boundary of “plan a field-research notebook for novice student observers”; 2) Field Research safety and access [LFT-058] — the draft left the dated learning plan, constraint map, and recovery checkpoint without a complete reviewer handoff and acceptance marker.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response LFT-058 retained the original fictional inputs, task boundary, and central decision: move M2 to day 3, keep P1 before P3, protect the day-9 review, and leave one recovery block open rather than exceeding 12 daily sessions. Concrete corrected artifact row LFT-058-ROW1 reads: “LFT-058-C1 | move M2 to day 3, keep P1 before P3, protect the day-9 review, and leave one recovery block open rather than exceeding 12 daily sessions | evidence locator: LFT-058-C1 | static status: 10/10 after one correction.” It changed only the detected failure areas, adding inspectable rows for Field Research objective fit [LFT-058] and Field Research safety and access [LFT-058]. The frozen final text passed Field Research objective fit [LFT-058], Field Research content accuracy [LFT-058], Field Research learner adaptation [LFT-058], Field Research evidence traceability [LFT-058], and Field Research safety and access [LFT-058]. All five declared dimensions had inspectable support after the one correction. The final dated learning plan, constraint map, and recovery checkpoint therefore earned 10/10 from 5 passing checks; no second repair was attempted. This result reports only a bounded transcript-and-fixture evaluation. It does not claim that any workplace process, learner performance, account, device, service, or external system was actually changed, contacted, tested live, or improved.Final score: 10/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Field Research objective fit [LFT-058] | Fail | Pass | LFT-058 static check 1 inspected the saved wording for “Field Research objective fit [LFT-058].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-058-M4, the declared Field Research rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Field Research content accuracy [LFT-058] | Pass | Pass | LFT-058 static check 2 inspected the saved wording for “Field Research content accuracy [LFT-058].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-058-M4, the declared Field Research rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Field Research learner adaptation [LFT-058] | Pass | Pass | LFT-058 static check 3 inspected the saved wording for “Field Research learner adaptation [LFT-058].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-058-M4, the declared Field Research rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Field Research evidence traceability [LFT-058] | Pass | Pass | LFT-058 static check 4 inspected the saved wording for “Field Research evidence traceability [LFT-058].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-058-M4, the declared Field Research rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Field Research safety and access [LFT-058] | Fail | Pass | LFT-058 static check 5 inspected the saved wording for “Field Research safety and access [LFT-058].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-058-M4, the declared Field Research rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- LFT-058 kept “plan a field-research notebook for novice student observers” bounded to disclosed fictional inputs and preserved an auditable first-response snapshot.
- LFT-058 made the central handling—move M2 to day 3, keep P1 before P3, protect the day-9 review, and leave one recovery block open rather than exceeding 12 daily sessions—inspectable rather than implying unseen work.
- LFT-058 earned final passes for Field Research objective fit [LFT-058] and Field Research content accuracy [LFT-058] under the same frozen scoring rules.
What failed or remained weak
- LFT-058’s first draft failed Field Research objective fit [LFT-058]; one correction repaired it, but the initial defect remains part of the published audit trail.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
A simulated field walk and completeness checklist will verify navigation, observation prompts, measurement capture, and ethics reminders.
- LFT-058 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- LFT-058 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 5 final-pass checks × 2 = 10/10.
- LFT-058 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A simulated field walk and completeness checklist will verify navigation, observation prompts, measurement capture, and ethics reminders.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- LFT-058 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Field Research fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- LFT-058 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.