Learning · Evidence record
Plan a Museum Observation Guide with AI — Completed Benchmark Result: 8/10
The completed LFT-046 synthetic field test reached 8/10 after one failure-only correction: 4 of five static checks passed for Museum learning, while 1 check remained unresolved.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
create an observation guide for a museum visit
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-046: The AI will prepare open-ended prompts that help students examine unfamiliar objects before reading labels. Source facts: objects LFT-046-M01 vessel and M02 textile; 35-minute visit; observe before labels; prompts shape/material/wear/function; no photography. Governing rule card: prompts separate visible evidence, interpretation, and label information. Tie each claim or interpretation to a supplied excerpt, observation, pitch, or locator; expose contradictions; do not infer an author, artist, or source motive that is absent. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-046 for “create an observation guide for a museum visit” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-046. Task: create an observation guide for a museum visit. Context: The AI will prepare open-ended prompts that help students examine unfamiliar objects before reading labels. Fictional source facts: objects LFT-046-M01 vessel and M02 textile; 35-minute visit; observe before labels; prompts shape/material/wear/function; no photography. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: prompts separate visible evidence, interpretation, and label information. Tie each claim or interpretation to a supplied excerpt, observation, pitch, or locator; expose contradictions; do not infer an author, artist, or source motive that is absent. Produce a museum observation guide, evidence prompts, and no-label-first sequence. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: Student response sheets and educator observation notes will show whether prompts elicit object-based noticing.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response LFT-046 produced a museum observation guide, evidence prompts, and no-label-first sequence for “create an observation guide for a museum visit.” Its first artifact row read “LFT-046-M01 | allocate eight minutes per object, request observable evidence before function inference, compare materials, and respect no photography | status: proposed | source: fictional fixture.” A second row named inference before observation and limited visit time and recorded a disposition. The rule cell mentioned without verifying prompts separate visible evidence, interpretation, and label information. No message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome occurred. The audit passed Museum learning learner adaptation [LFT-046], Museum learning evidence traceability [LFT-046], and Museum learning safety and access [LFT-046]. It found for Museum learning objective fit [LFT-046], the draft did not link LFT-046-M01 to the full task boundary; for Museum learning content accuracy [LFT-046], the draft mentioned but did not verify prompts separate visible evidence, interpretation, and label information. Those evidence defects—and no style preference or new goal—became the complete single-correction prompt.Initial score: 6/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected LFT-046 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Museum learning objective fit [LFT-046] — the draft did not link LFT-046-M01 to the full task boundary; 2) Museum learning content accuracy [LFT-046] — the draft mentioned but did not verify prompts separate visible evidence, interpretation, and label information.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response LFT-046 preserved all supplied identifiers and the central decision: allocate eight minutes per object, request observable evidence before function inference, compare materials, and respect no photography. Its corrected row read “LFT-046-M01 | rule: prompts separate visible evidence, interpretation, and label information | decision: allocate eight minutes per object, request observable evidence before function inference, compare materials, and respect no photography | static status: 8/10.” It changed only failed dimensions, adding support for Museum learning objective fit [LFT-046]. The final audit passed Museum learning objective fit [LFT-046], Museum learning learner adaptation [LFT-046], Museum learning evidence traceability [LFT-046], and Museum learning safety and access [LFT-046]. It still lacked Museum learning content accuracy [LFT-046]; those failures remain visible. The museum observation guide, evidence prompts, and no-label-first sequence earned 8/10 from 4 checks; no second repair was attempted. This transcript-and-fixture result does not claim any person, workplace, learner, account, device, service, or external system was contacted, changed, tested live, or improved.Final score: 8/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Museum learning objective fit [LFT-046] | Fail | Pass | LFT-046 static check 1 inspected “Museum learning objective fit [LFT-046]” against LFT-046-M01, the rule “prompts separate visible evidence, interpretation, and label information,” and the saved museum observation guide, evidence prompts, and no-label-first sequence. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Museum learning content accuracy [LFT-046] | Fail | Fail | LFT-046 static check 2 inspected “Museum learning content accuracy [LFT-046]” against LFT-046-M01, the rule “prompts separate visible evidence, interpretation, and label information,” and the saved museum observation guide, evidence prompts, and no-label-first sequence. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript failed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Museum learning learner adaptation [LFT-046] | Pass | Pass | LFT-046 static check 3 inspected “Museum learning learner adaptation [LFT-046]” against LFT-046-M01, the rule “prompts separate visible evidence, interpretation, and label information,” and the saved museum observation guide, evidence prompts, and no-label-first sequence. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Museum learning evidence traceability [LFT-046] | Pass | Pass | LFT-046 static check 4 inspected “Museum learning evidence traceability [LFT-046]” against LFT-046-M01, the rule “prompts separate visible evidence, interpretation, and label information,” and the saved museum observation guide, evidence prompts, and no-label-first sequence. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Museum learning safety and access [LFT-046] | Pass | Pass | LFT-046 static check 5 inspected “Museum learning safety and access [LFT-046]” against LFT-046-M01, the rule “prompts separate visible evidence, interpretation, and label information,” and the saved museum observation guide, evidence prompts, and no-label-first sequence. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- LFT-046 bounded “create an observation guide for a museum visit” to disclosed fictional inputs and froze the first response.
- LFT-046 exposed LFT-046-M01—allocate eight minutes per object, request observable evidence before function inference, compare materials, and respect no photography—inside the saved museum observation guide, evidence prompts, and no-label-first sequence.
- LFT-046 earned inspectable passes for Museum learning objective fit [LFT-046] and Museum learning learner adaptation [LFT-046] under the unchanged rubric.
What failed or remained weak
- LFT-046 still lacked saved-text evidence for Museum learning content accuracy [LFT-046]; that failure remains published.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
Student response sheets and educator observation notes will show whether prompts elicit object-based noticing.
- LFT-046 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- LFT-046 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 4 final-pass checks × 2 = 8/10.
- LFT-046 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—Student response sheets and educator observation notes will show whether prompts elicit object-based noticing.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- LFT-046 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Museum learning fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- LFT-046 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.