Learning · Evidence record
A Local Climate Dataset as the Basis for AI-Guided Inquiry — Completed Benchmark Result: 8/10
The completed LFT-034 synthetic field test reached 8/10 after one failure-only correction: 4 of five static checks passed for Data inquiry, while 1 check remained unresolved.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
guide an inquiry using a local climate dataset
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-034: Students will formulate and test questions about seasonal patterns in a supplied temperature dataset. Source facts: fictional observations LFT-034-S01 through LFT-034-S06; temperature readings 18, 21, 27, 22, 19, and 20°C; control C0; variable V1; one confounded sample S04; and mandatory safety note Q2. Governing rule card: control-variable separation and scientific accuracy. Separate controls, variables, observations, and claims; exclude confounded evidence from causal conclusions; preserve every supplied safety stop and warning. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-034 for “guide an inquiry using a local climate dataset” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-034. Task: guide an inquiry using a local climate dataset. Context: Students will formulate and test questions about seasonal patterns in a supplied temperature dataset. Fictional source facts: fictional observations LFT-034-S01 through LFT-034-S06; temperature readings 18, 21, 27, 22, 19, and 20°C; control C0; variable V1; one confounded sample S04; and mandatory safety note Q2. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: control-variable separation and scientific accuracy. Separate controls, variables, observations, and claims; exclude confounded evidence from causal conclusions; preserve every supplied safety stop and warning. Produce an inquiry sequence, evidence table, and safety-or-misconception checkpoint. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: Saved calculations and charts will be traced to the dataset and reviewed for justified interpretations.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response LFT-034 produced an inquiry sequence, evidence table, and safety-or-misconception checkpoint for the task “guide an inquiry using a local climate dataset.” It treated the supplied pack as fictional and proposed this central handling: compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-034-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion. Concrete saved artifact row LFT-034-ROW1 reads: “LFT-034-S01 | compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-034-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion | source: supplied fictional pack | review state: first-draft.” The draft preserved the named records and separated supplied facts from assumptions; its inspectable learning intervention also stated that no message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome had occurred. On the five predeclared static checks, it passed Data inquiry objective fit [LFT-034], Data inquiry evidence traceability [LFT-034], and Data inquiry safety and access [LFT-034]. The audit found concrete failures: for Data inquiry content accuracy [LFT-034], the saved draft left control-variable separation and scientific accuracy without an explicit verification row; for Data inquiry learner adaptation [LFT-034], the saved draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the confounded LFT-034-S04 observation and mandatory Q2 warning. Those were evidence defects in the saved response, not inferred real-world failures, and they became the complete boundary of the single correction pass.Initial score: 6/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected LFT-034 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Data inquiry content accuracy [LFT-034] — the draft left control-variable separation and scientific accuracy without an explicit verification row; 2) Data inquiry learner adaptation [LFT-034] — the draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the confounded LFT-034-S04 observation and mandatory Q2 warning.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response LFT-034 retained the original fictional inputs, task boundary, and central decision: compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-034-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion. Concrete corrected artifact row LFT-034-ROW1 reads: “LFT-034-S01 | compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-034-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion | evidence locator: LFT-034-S01 | static status: 8/10 after one correction.” It changed only the detected failure areas, adding inspectable rows for Data inquiry content accuracy [LFT-034]. The frozen final text passed Data inquiry objective fit [LFT-034], Data inquiry content accuracy [LFT-034], Data inquiry evidence traceability [LFT-034], and Data inquiry safety and access [LFT-034] and still failed Data inquiry learner adaptation [LFT-034]. The final inquiry sequence, evidence table, and safety-or-misconception checkpoint therefore earned 8/10 from 4 passing checks; no second repair was attempted. This result reports only a bounded transcript-and-fixture evaluation. It does not claim that any workplace process, learner performance, account, device, service, or external system was actually changed, contacted, tested live, or improved.Final score: 8/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data inquiry objective fit [LFT-034] | Pass | Pass | LFT-034 static check 1 inspected the saved wording for “Data inquiry objective fit [LFT-034].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-034-S04, the declared Data inquiry rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Data inquiry content accuracy [LFT-034] | Fail | Pass | LFT-034 static check 2 inspected the saved wording for “Data inquiry content accuracy [LFT-034].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-034-S04, the declared Data inquiry rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Data inquiry learner adaptation [LFT-034] | Fail | Fail | LFT-034 static check 3 inspected the saved wording for “Data inquiry learner adaptation [LFT-034].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-034-S04, the declared Data inquiry rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Data inquiry evidence traceability [LFT-034] | Pass | Pass | LFT-034 static check 4 inspected the saved wording for “Data inquiry evidence traceability [LFT-034].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-034-S04, the declared Data inquiry rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Data inquiry safety and access [LFT-034] | Pass | Pass | LFT-034 static check 5 inspected the saved wording for “Data inquiry safety and access [LFT-034].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-034-S04, the declared Data inquiry rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- LFT-034 kept “guide an inquiry using a local climate dataset” bounded to disclosed fictional inputs and preserved an auditable first-response snapshot.
- LFT-034 made the central handling—compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-034-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion—inspectable rather than implying unseen work.
- LFT-034 earned final passes for Data inquiry objective fit [LFT-034] and Data inquiry content accuracy [LFT-034] under the same frozen scoring rules.
What failed or remained weak
- LFT-034 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Data inquiry learner adaptation [LFT-034]; the record leaves that final failure visible.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
Saved calculations and charts will be traced to the dataset and reviewed for justified interpretations.
- LFT-034 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- LFT-034 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 4 final-pass checks × 2 = 8/10.
- LFT-034 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—Saved calculations and charts will be traced to the dataset and reviewed for justified interpretations.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- LFT-034 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Data inquiry fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- LFT-034 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.