Learning · Evidence record
Map Route Distances with AI to Learn Scale: The One-Pass Revision Reached 10/10
The completed LFT-033 synthetic field test reached 10/10 after one failure-only correction: 5 of five static checks passed for Map reasoning, while 0 checks remained unresolved.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
teach map-scale reasoning through route planning
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-033: Learners will estimate and calculate travel distances from maps with different scales. Source facts: transit map LFT-033-M01; scale 1 cm=2.5 km; A–B 3.2 cm, B–C 1.8 cm; transfer B; north arrow rotated 20°; access icon C. Governing rule card: distance conversion, route continuity, legend, and orientation. Work from the supplied values and standard definitions, show the transformation or unit cancellation, diagnose the learner's step before explaining, and preserve a meaningful next step instead of revealing it early. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-033 for “teach map-scale reasoning through route planning” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-033. Task: teach map-scale reasoning through route planning. Context: Learners will estimate and calculate travel distances from maps with different scales. Fictional source facts: transit map LFT-033-M01; scale 1 cm=2.5 km; A–B 3.2 cm, B–C 1.8 cm; transfer B; north arrow rotated 20°; access icon C. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: distance conversion, route continuity, legend, and orientation. Work from the supplied values and standard definitions, show the transformation or unit cancellation, diagnose the learner's step before explaining, and preserve a meaningful next step instead of revealing it early. Produce a graduated route tasks, scale calculations, and answer-key map. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: Calculation sheets will be checked against measured reference distances and unit-conversion steps.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response LFT-033 produced a graduated route tasks, scale calculations, and answer-key map for “teach map-scale reasoning through route planning.” Its first artifact row read “LFT-033-M01 | calculate A–C as 12.5 km, identify transfer B, use the rotated north arrow, and retain the access symbol | status: proposed | source: fictional fixture.” A second row named the rotated north arrow and addition of two route segments and recorded a disposition. The rule cell verified distance conversion, route continuity, legend, and orientation. No message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome occurred. The audit passed Map reasoning content accuracy [LFT-033], Map reasoning learner adaptation [LFT-033], and Map reasoning evidence traceability [LFT-033]. It found for Map reasoning objective fit [LFT-033], the draft did not link LFT-033-M01 to the full task boundary; for Map reasoning safety and access [LFT-033], the draft left the graduated route tasks, scale calculations, and answer-key map without a reviewer-ready acceptance marker. Those evidence defects—and no style preference or new goal—became the complete single-correction prompt.Initial score: 6/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected LFT-033 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Map reasoning objective fit [LFT-033] — the draft did not link LFT-033-M01 to the full task boundary; 2) Map reasoning safety and access [LFT-033] — the draft left the graduated route tasks, scale calculations, and answer-key map without a reviewer-ready acceptance marker.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response LFT-033 preserved all supplied identifiers and the central decision: calculate A–C as 12.5 km, identify transfer B, use the rotated north arrow, and retain the access symbol. Its corrected row read “LFT-033-M01 | rule: distance conversion, route continuity, legend, and orientation | decision: calculate A–C as 12.5 km, identify transfer B, use the rotated north arrow, and retain the access symbol | static status: 10/10.” It changed only failed dimensions, adding support for Map reasoning objective fit [LFT-033] and Map reasoning safety and access [LFT-033]. The final audit passed Map reasoning objective fit [LFT-033], Map reasoning content accuracy [LFT-033], Map reasoning learner adaptation [LFT-033], Map reasoning evidence traceability [LFT-033], and Map reasoning safety and access [LFT-033]. All five dimensions had inspectable support after one correction. The graduated route tasks, scale calculations, and answer-key map earned 10/10 from 5 checks; no second repair was attempted. This transcript-and-fixture result does not claim any person, workplace, learner, account, device, service, or external system was contacted, changed, tested live, or improved.Final score: 10/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Map reasoning objective fit [LFT-033] | Fail | Pass | LFT-033 static check 1 inspected “Map reasoning objective fit [LFT-033]” against LFT-033-M01, the rule “distance conversion, route continuity, legend, and orientation,” and the saved graduated route tasks, scale calculations, and answer-key map. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Map reasoning content accuracy [LFT-033] | Pass | Pass | LFT-033 static check 2 inspected “Map reasoning content accuracy [LFT-033]” against LFT-033-M01, the rule “distance conversion, route continuity, legend, and orientation,” and the saved graduated route tasks, scale calculations, and answer-key map. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Map reasoning learner adaptation [LFT-033] | Pass | Pass | LFT-033 static check 3 inspected “Map reasoning learner adaptation [LFT-033]” against LFT-033-M01, the rule “distance conversion, route continuity, legend, and orientation,” and the saved graduated route tasks, scale calculations, and answer-key map. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Map reasoning evidence traceability [LFT-033] | Pass | Pass | LFT-033 static check 4 inspected “Map reasoning evidence traceability [LFT-033]” against LFT-033-M01, the rule “distance conversion, route continuity, legend, and orientation,” and the saved graduated route tasks, scale calculations, and answer-key map. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Map reasoning safety and access [LFT-033] | Fail | Pass | LFT-033 static check 5 inspected “Map reasoning safety and access [LFT-033]” against LFT-033-M01, the rule “distance conversion, route continuity, legend, and orientation,” and the saved graduated route tasks, scale calculations, and answer-key map. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- LFT-033 bounded “teach map-scale reasoning through route planning” to disclosed fictional inputs and froze the first response.
- LFT-033 exposed LFT-033-M01—calculate A–C as 12.5 km, identify transfer B, use the rotated north arrow, and retain the access symbol—inside the saved graduated route tasks, scale calculations, and answer-key map.
- LFT-033 earned inspectable passes for Map reasoning objective fit [LFT-033] and Map reasoning content accuracy [LFT-033] under the unchanged rubric.
What failed or remained weak
- LFT-033 first failed Map reasoning objective fit [LFT-033]; one correction repaired it while preserving the defect in the audit trail.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
Calculation sheets will be checked against measured reference distances and unit-conversion steps.
- LFT-033 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- LFT-033 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 5 final-pass checks × 2 = 10/10.
- LFT-033 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—Calculation sheets will be checked against measured reference distances and unit-conversion steps.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- LFT-033 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Map reasoning fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- LFT-033 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.