Learning · Evidence record
AI-Adaptive Retrieval Practice Based on Learner Uncertainty: The One-Pass Revision Reached 8/10
The completed LFT-021 synthetic field test reached 8/10 after one failure-only correction: 4 of five static checks passed for Adaptive practice, while 1 check remained unresolved.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
adapt retrieval practice to a learner's uncertainty
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-021: The AI will vary question timing and difficulty using a learner's answers and confidence reports. Source facts: items LFT-021-R01–R08; correctness T/F/T/T/F/F/T/F; confidence 4/5/2/3/5/1/3/2; 12-prompt limit. Governing rule card: adapt from correctness plus confidence without collapsing spacing. Honor fixed dates, available block lengths, prerequisite order, spacing intervals, workload ceilings, recovery space, and any learner-controlled stop condition. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-021 for “adapt retrieval practice to a learner's uncertainty” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-021. Task: adapt retrieval practice to a learner's uncertainty. Context: The AI will vary question timing and difficulty using a learner's answers and confidence reports. Fictional source facts: items LFT-021-R01–R08; correctness T/F/T/T/F/F/T/F; confidence 4/5/2/3/5/1/3/2; 12-prompt limit. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: adapt from correctness plus confidence without collapsing spacing. Honor fixed dates, available block lengths, prerequisite order, spacing intervals, workload ceilings, recovery space, and any learner-controlled stop condition. Produce a confidence-aware retrieval session, branching log, and spacing decision. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A session log will verify that each adaptation follows the declared answer-and-confidence rules.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response LFT-021 produced a confidence-aware retrieval session, branching log, and spacing decision for “adapt retrieval practice to a learner's uncertainty.” Its first artifact row read “LFT-021-R05 | prioritize confidently wrong R02/R05, delay low-confidence R06 after explanation, and interleave repeats | status: proposed | source: fictional fixture.” A second row named the confidently wrong R05 and fatigue after prompt 10 and recorded a disposition. The rule cell mentioned without verifying adapt from correctness plus confidence without collapsing spacing. No message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome occurred. The audit passed Adaptive practice learner adaptation [LFT-021], Adaptive practice evidence traceability [LFT-021], and Adaptive practice safety and access [LFT-021]. It found for Adaptive practice objective fit [LFT-021], the draft did not link LFT-021-R05 to the full task boundary; for Adaptive practice content accuracy [LFT-021], the draft mentioned but did not verify adapt from correctness plus confidence without collapsing spacing. Those evidence defects—and no style preference or new goal—became the complete single-correction prompt.Initial score: 6/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected LFT-021 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Adaptive practice objective fit [LFT-021] — the draft did not link LFT-021-R05 to the full task boundary; 2) Adaptive practice content accuracy [LFT-021] — the draft mentioned but did not verify adapt from correctness plus confidence without collapsing spacing.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response LFT-021 preserved all supplied identifiers and the central decision: prioritize confidently wrong R02/R05, delay low-confidence R06 after explanation, and interleave repeats. Its corrected row read “LFT-021-R05 | rule: adapt from correctness plus confidence without collapsing spacing | decision: prioritize confidently wrong R02/R05, delay low-confidence R06 after explanation, and interleave repeats | static status: 8/10.” It changed only failed dimensions, adding support for Adaptive practice objective fit [LFT-021]. The final audit passed Adaptive practice objective fit [LFT-021], Adaptive practice learner adaptation [LFT-021], Adaptive practice evidence traceability [LFT-021], and Adaptive practice safety and access [LFT-021]. It still lacked Adaptive practice content accuracy [LFT-021]; those failures remain visible. The confidence-aware retrieval session, branching log, and spacing decision earned 8/10 from 4 checks; no second repair was attempted. This transcript-and-fixture result does not claim any person, workplace, learner, account, device, service, or external system was contacted, changed, tested live, or improved.Final score: 8/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive practice objective fit [LFT-021] | Fail | Pass | LFT-021 static check 1 inspected “Adaptive practice objective fit [LFT-021]” against LFT-021-R05, the rule “adapt from correctness plus confidence without collapsing spacing,” and the saved confidence-aware retrieval session, branching log, and spacing decision. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Adaptive practice content accuracy [LFT-021] | Fail | Fail | LFT-021 static check 2 inspected “Adaptive practice content accuracy [LFT-021]” against LFT-021-R05, the rule “adapt from correctness plus confidence without collapsing spacing,” and the saved confidence-aware retrieval session, branching log, and spacing decision. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript failed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Adaptive practice learner adaptation [LFT-021] | Pass | Pass | LFT-021 static check 3 inspected “Adaptive practice learner adaptation [LFT-021]” against LFT-021-R05, the rule “adapt from correctness plus confidence without collapsing spacing,” and the saved confidence-aware retrieval session, branching log, and spacing decision. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Adaptive practice evidence traceability [LFT-021] | Pass | Pass | LFT-021 static check 4 inspected “Adaptive practice evidence traceability [LFT-021]” against LFT-021-R05, the rule “adapt from correctness plus confidence without collapsing spacing,” and the saved confidence-aware retrieval session, branching log, and spacing decision. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Adaptive practice safety and access [LFT-021] | Pass | Pass | LFT-021 static check 5 inspected “Adaptive practice safety and access [LFT-021]” against LFT-021-R05, the rule “adapt from correctness plus confidence without collapsing spacing,” and the saved confidence-aware retrieval session, branching log, and spacing decision. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- LFT-021 bounded “adapt retrieval practice to a learner's uncertainty” to disclosed fictional inputs and froze the first response.
- LFT-021 exposed LFT-021-R05—prioritize confidently wrong R02/R05, delay low-confidence R06 after explanation, and interleave repeats—inside the saved confidence-aware retrieval session, branching log, and spacing decision.
- LFT-021 earned inspectable passes for Adaptive practice objective fit [LFT-021] and Adaptive practice learner adaptation [LFT-021] under the unchanged rubric.
What failed or remained weak
- LFT-021 still lacked saved-text evidence for Adaptive practice content accuracy [LFT-021]; that failure remains published.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
A session log will verify that each adaptation follows the declared answer-and-confidence rules.
- LFT-021 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- LFT-021 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 4 final-pass checks × 2 = 8/10.
- LFT-021 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A session log will verify that each adaptation follows the declared answer-and-confidence rules.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- LFT-021 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Adaptive practice fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- LFT-021 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.