Work · Evidence record
From Operational Logs to an Actionable Shift Handover: The Completed Test Finished at 4/10
The completed WFT-037 synthetic field test finished at 4/10 and was not recommended: only two of five Shift Handover checks passed after the permitted correction.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
create a shift handover from operational logs
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack WFT-037: A facilities team will provide alarms, work orders, operator notes, and unresolved items from one shift. Source facts: records WFT-037-R01 through WFT-037-R06; two fixed windows at 08:00–12:00 and 13:00–17:00; capacity limits of 37 and 51; dependency WFT-037-R04 after WFT-037-R02; and an unavailable interval for WFT-037-R05. Governing rule card: the two window limits (37 and 51). Honor fixed windows, availability, blackout periods, predecessor order, travel or rest buffers, and capacity limits before optimizing; leave an item unassigned when no feasible slot exists. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark WFT-037 for “create a shift handover from operational logs” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 4 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test WFT-037. Task: create a shift handover from operational logs. Context: A facilities team will provide alarms, work orders, operator notes, and unresolved items from one shift. Fictional source facts: records WFT-037-R01 through WFT-037-R06; two fixed windows at 08:00–12:00 and 13:00–17:00; capacity limits of 37 and 51; dependency WFT-037-R04 after WFT-037-R02; and an unavailable interval for WFT-037-R05. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: the two window limits (37 and 51). Honor fixed windows, availability, blackout periods, predecessor order, travel or rest buffers, and capacity limits before optimizing; leave an item unassigned when no feasible slot exists. Produce a constraint table, sequenced plan, and exception register. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A handover brief with log references and incoming-supervisor review will verify status, priority, and ownership.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response WFT-037 produced a constraint table, sequenced plan, and exception register for the task “create a shift handover from operational logs.” It treated the supplied pack as fictional and proposed this central handling: keep WFT-037-R05 outside its unavailable interval, place WFT-037-R04 only after WFT-037-R02, and flag the second window when demand 51 exceeds the stated capacity. Concrete saved artifact row WFT-037-ROW1 reads: “WFT-037-R01 | keep WFT-037-R05 outside its unavailable interval, place WFT-037-R04 only after WFT-037-R02, and flag the second window when demand 51 exceeds the stated capacity | source: supplied fictional pack | review state: first-draft.” The draft preserved the named records and separated supplied facts from assumptions; its inspectable work product also stated that no message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome had occurred. On the five predeclared static checks, it passed Shift Handover exception handling [WFT-037]. The audit found concrete failures: for Shift Handover task fidelity [WFT-037], the saved draft did not connect WFT-037-R05 to the full boundary of “create a shift handover from operational logs”; for Shift Handover rule accuracy [WFT-037], the saved draft left the two window limits (37 and 51) without an explicit verification row; for Shift Handover source traceability [WFT-037], the saved draft gave the central WFT-037-R05 decision no source-to-output locator; for Shift Handover handoff usability [WFT-037], the saved draft left the constraint table, sequenced plan, and exception register without a complete reviewer handoff and acceptance marker. Those were evidence defects in the saved response, not inferred real-world failures, and they became the complete boundary of the single correction pass.Initial score: 2/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected WFT-037 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Shift Handover task fidelity [WFT-037] — the draft did not connect WFT-037-R05 to the full boundary of “create a shift handover from operational logs”; 2) Shift Handover rule accuracy [WFT-037] — the draft left the two window limits (37 and 51) without an explicit verification row; 3) Shift Handover source traceability [WFT-037] — the draft gave the central WFT-037-R05 decision no source-to-output locator; 4) Shift Handover handoff usability [WFT-037] — the draft left the constraint table, sequenced plan, and exception register without a complete reviewer handoff and acceptance marker.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response WFT-037 retained the original fictional inputs, task boundary, and central decision: keep WFT-037-R05 outside its unavailable interval, place WFT-037-R04 only after WFT-037-R02, and flag the second window when demand 51 exceeds the stated capacity. Concrete corrected artifact row WFT-037-ROW1 reads: “WFT-037-R01 | keep WFT-037-R05 outside its unavailable interval, place WFT-037-R04 only after WFT-037-R02, and flag the second window when demand 51 exceeds the stated capacity | evidence locator: WFT-037-R01 | static status: 4/10 after one correction.” It changed only the detected failure areas, adding inspectable rows for Shift Handover source traceability [WFT-037]. The frozen final text passed Shift Handover exception handling [WFT-037] and Shift Handover source traceability [WFT-037] and still failed Shift Handover task fidelity [WFT-037], Shift Handover rule accuracy [WFT-037], and Shift Handover handoff usability [WFT-037]. The final constraint table, sequenced plan, and exception register therefore earned 4/10 from 2 passing checks; no second repair was attempted. This result reports only a bounded transcript-and-fixture evaluation. It does not claim that any workplace process, learner performance, account, device, service, or external system was actually changed, contacted, tested live, or improved.Final score: 4/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shift Handover task fidelity [WFT-037] | Fail | Fail | WFT-037 static check 1 inspected the saved wording for “Shift Handover task fidelity [WFT-037].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-037-R05, the declared Shift Handover rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Shift Handover rule accuracy [WFT-037] | Fail | Fail | WFT-037 static check 2 inspected the saved wording for “Shift Handover rule accuracy [WFT-037].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-037-R05, the declared Shift Handover rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Shift Handover exception handling [WFT-037] | Pass | Pass | WFT-037 static check 3 inspected the saved wording for “Shift Handover exception handling [WFT-037].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-037-R05, the declared Shift Handover rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Shift Handover source traceability [WFT-037] | Fail | Pass | WFT-037 static check 4 inspected the saved wording for “Shift Handover source traceability [WFT-037].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-037-R05, the declared Shift Handover rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Shift Handover handoff usability [WFT-037] | Fail | Fail | WFT-037 static check 5 inspected the saved wording for “Shift Handover handoff usability [WFT-037].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-037-R05, the declared Shift Handover rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- WFT-037 kept “create a shift handover from operational logs” bounded to disclosed fictional inputs and preserved an auditable first-response snapshot.
- WFT-037 made the central handling—keep WFT-037-R05 outside its unavailable interval, place WFT-037-R04 only after WFT-037-R02, and flag the second window when demand 51 exceeds the stated capacity—inspectable rather than implying unseen work.
What failed or remained weak
- WFT-037 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Shift Handover task fidelity [WFT-037]; the record leaves that final failure visible.
- WFT-037 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Shift Handover rule accuracy [WFT-037]; the record leaves that final failure visible.
- WFT-037 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Shift Handover handoff usability [WFT-037]; the record leaves that final failure visible.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
A handover brief with log references and incoming-supervisor review will verify status, priority, and ownership.
- WFT-037 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- WFT-037 scores are arithmetic: 1 first-pass checks × 2 = 2/10; 2 final-pass checks × 2 = 4/10.
- WFT-037 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A handover brief with log references and incoming-supervisor review will verify status, priority, and ownership.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- WFT-037 is a synthetic benchmark, so its failed verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Shift Handover fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- WFT-037 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.