Work · Evidence record
Prioritizing an Accounts Receivable Collections Queue with AI: The One-Pass Revision Reached 10/10
The completed WFT-041 synthetic field test reached 10/10 after one failure-only correction: 5 of five static checks passed for Collections Planning, while 0 checks remained unresolved.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
prioritize an accounts receivable collections queue
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack WFT-041: A credit team will supply open invoices, aging, dispute status, payment promises, and customer-contact restrictions. Source facts: accounts WFT-041-AR01–AR06; balances $420–$48,000; overdue 8–94 days; dispute AR03; promised payment AR05 tomorrow; hold AR06. Governing rule card: days overdue, balance, dispute, promise date, and approved holds. Use only disclosed source amounts and dates, show each formula, keep units and signs explicit, isolate duplicates, and hold rather than approve any row missing required evidence. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark WFT-041 for “prioritize an accounts receivable collections queue” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test WFT-041. Task: prioritize an accounts receivable collections queue. Context: A credit team will supply open invoices, aging, dispute status, payment promises, and customer-contact restrictions. Fictional source facts: accounts WFT-041-AR01–AR06; balances $420–$48,000; overdue 8–94 days; dispute AR03; promised payment AR05 tomorrow; hold AR06. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: days overdue, balance, dispute, promise date, and approved holds. Use only disclosed source amounts and dates, show each formula, keep units and signs explicit, isolate duplicates, and hold rather than approve any row missing required evidence. Produce a collections priority queue, reason codes, and protected-account exceptions. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A prioritized queue and a rule-by-rule review will verify ordering, exclusions, and proposed next actions.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response WFT-041 produced a collections priority queue, reason codes, and protected-account exceptions for “prioritize an accounts receivable collections queue.” Its first artifact row read “WFT-041-AR03 | rank undisputed AR02 first, remove AR03 from routine collection, defer AR05, and preserve AR06’s hold | status: proposed | source: fictional fixture.” A second row named AR03’s dispute and AR06’s strategic hold and recorded a disposition. The rule cell verified days overdue, balance, dispute, promise date, and approved holds. No message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome occurred. The audit passed Collections Planning task fidelity [WFT-041], Collections Planning rule accuracy [WFT-041], and Collections Planning exception handling [WFT-041]. It found for Collections Planning source traceability [WFT-041], the draft gave WFT-041-AR03 no source locator; for Collections Planning handoff usability [WFT-041], the draft left the collections priority queue, reason codes, and protected-account exceptions without a reviewer-ready acceptance marker. Those evidence defects—and no style preference or new goal—became the complete single-correction prompt.Initial score: 6/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected WFT-041 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Collections Planning source traceability [WFT-041] — the draft gave WFT-041-AR03 no source locator; 2) Collections Planning handoff usability [WFT-041] — the draft left the collections priority queue, reason codes, and protected-account exceptions without a reviewer-ready acceptance marker.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response WFT-041 preserved all supplied identifiers and the central decision: rank undisputed AR02 first, remove AR03 from routine collection, defer AR05, and preserve AR06’s hold. Its corrected row read “WFT-041-AR03 | rule: days overdue, balance, dispute, promise date, and approved holds | decision: rank undisputed AR02 first, remove AR03 from routine collection, defer AR05, and preserve AR06’s hold | static status: 10/10.” It changed only failed dimensions, adding support for Collections Planning source traceability [WFT-041] and Collections Planning handoff usability [WFT-041]. The final audit passed Collections Planning task fidelity [WFT-041], Collections Planning rule accuracy [WFT-041], Collections Planning exception handling [WFT-041], Collections Planning source traceability [WFT-041], and Collections Planning handoff usability [WFT-041]. All five dimensions had inspectable support after one correction. The collections priority queue, reason codes, and protected-account exceptions earned 10/10 from 5 checks; no second repair was attempted. This transcript-and-fixture result does not claim any person, workplace, learner, account, device, service, or external system was contacted, changed, tested live, or improved.Final score: 10/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collections Planning task fidelity [WFT-041] | Pass | Pass | WFT-041 static check 1 inspected “Collections Planning task fidelity [WFT-041]” against WFT-041-AR03, the rule “days overdue, balance, dispute, promise date, and approved holds,” and the saved collections priority queue, reason codes, and protected-account exceptions. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Collections Planning rule accuracy [WFT-041] | Pass | Pass | WFT-041 static check 2 inspected “Collections Planning rule accuracy [WFT-041]” against WFT-041-AR03, the rule “days overdue, balance, dispute, promise date, and approved holds,” and the saved collections priority queue, reason codes, and protected-account exceptions. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Collections Planning exception handling [WFT-041] | Pass | Pass | WFT-041 static check 3 inspected “Collections Planning exception handling [WFT-041]” against WFT-041-AR03, the rule “days overdue, balance, dispute, promise date, and approved holds,” and the saved collections priority queue, reason codes, and protected-account exceptions. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Collections Planning source traceability [WFT-041] | Fail | Pass | WFT-041 static check 4 inspected “Collections Planning source traceability [WFT-041]” against WFT-041-AR03, the rule “days overdue, balance, dispute, promise date, and approved holds,” and the saved collections priority queue, reason codes, and protected-account exceptions. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Collections Planning handoff usability [WFT-041] | Fail | Pass | WFT-041 static check 5 inspected “Collections Planning handoff usability [WFT-041]” against WFT-041-AR03, the rule “days overdue, balance, dispute, promise date, and approved holds,” and the saved collections priority queue, reason codes, and protected-account exceptions. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- WFT-041 bounded “prioritize an accounts receivable collections queue” to disclosed fictional inputs and froze the first response.
- WFT-041 exposed WFT-041-AR03—rank undisputed AR02 first, remove AR03 from routine collection, defer AR05, and preserve AR06’s hold—inside the saved collections priority queue, reason codes, and protected-account exceptions.
- WFT-041 earned inspectable passes for Collections Planning task fidelity [WFT-041] and Collections Planning rule accuracy [WFT-041] under the unchanged rubric.
What failed or remained weak
- WFT-041 first failed Collections Planning source traceability [WFT-041]; one correction repaired it while preserving the defect in the audit trail.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
A prioritized queue and a rule-by-rule review will verify ordering, exclusions, and proposed next actions.
- WFT-041 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- WFT-041 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 5 final-pass checks × 2 = 10/10.
- WFT-041 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A prioritized queue and a rule-by-rule review will verify ordering, exclusions, and proposed next actions.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- WFT-041 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Collections Planning fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- WFT-041 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.