Work · Evidence record
Three Cash-Flow Scenarios, One Auditable AI Model: The One-Pass Revision Reached 8/10
The completed WFT-053 synthetic field test reached 8/10 after one failure-only correction: 4 of five static checks passed for Cash-Flow Modeling, while 1 check remained unresolved.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
build three cash-flow scenarios from a supplied operating forecast
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack WFT-053: A small business will provide receivables, payables, payroll dates, financing terms, and explicit base, upside, and downside assumptions. Source facts: opening cash $82,000; receivables $31,000 week 2 and $18,000 week 5; payroll $24,500 biweekly; rent $8,200 week 1; downside delay 14 days; upside sales +12%. Governing rule card: weekly opening plus inflows minus outflows equals closing, with scenario assumptions separated. Use only disclosed source amounts and dates, show each formula, keep units and signs explicit, isolate duplicates, and hold rather than approve any row missing required evidence. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark WFT-053 for “build three cash-flow scenarios from a supplied operating forecast” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test WFT-053. Task: build three cash-flow scenarios from a supplied operating forecast. Context: A small business will provide receivables, payables, payroll dates, financing terms, and explicit base, upside, and downside assumptions. Fictional source facts: opening cash $82,000; receivables $31,000 week 2 and $18,000 week 5; payroll $24,500 biweekly; rent $8,200 week 1; downside delay 14 days; upside sales +12%. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: weekly opening plus inflows minus outflows equals closing, with scenario assumptions separated. Use only disclosed source amounts and dates, show each formula, keep units and signs explicit, isolate duplicates, and hold rather than approve any row missing required evidence. Produce a thirteen-week cash schedule, scenario table, and assumption register. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A formula-audited workbook will trace every scenario balance to source inputs and flag any negative-cash period.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response WFT-053 produced a thirteen-week cash schedule, scenario table, and assumption register for “build three cash-flow scenarios from a supplied operating forecast.” Its first artifact row read “WFT-053-W02 | carry the $82,000 opening balance, place payroll only on scheduled weeks, move the downside receivable by 14 days, and expose the lowest closing balance | status: proposed | source: fictional fixture.” A second row named the delayed week-2 receivable and biweekly payroll timing and left the disposition blank. The rule cell verified weekly opening plus inflows minus outflows equals closing, with scenario assumptions separated. No message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome occurred. The audit passed Cash-Flow Modeling task fidelity [WFT-053], Cash-Flow Modeling rule accuracy [WFT-053], and Cash-Flow Modeling handoff usability [WFT-053]. It found for Cash-Flow Modeling exception handling [WFT-053], the draft left the delayed week-2 receivable and biweekly payroll timing without an explicit disposition; for Cash-Flow Modeling source traceability [WFT-053], the draft gave WFT-053-W02 no source locator. Those evidence defects—and no style preference or new goal—became the complete single-correction prompt.Initial score: 6/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected WFT-053 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Cash-Flow Modeling exception handling [WFT-053] — the draft left the delayed week-2 receivable and biweekly payroll timing without an explicit disposition; 2) Cash-Flow Modeling source traceability [WFT-053] — the draft gave WFT-053-W02 no source locator.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response WFT-053 preserved all supplied identifiers and the central decision: carry the $82,000 opening balance, place payroll only on scheduled weeks, move the downside receivable by 14 days, and expose the lowest closing balance. Its corrected row read “WFT-053-W02 | rule: weekly opening plus inflows minus outflows equals closing, with scenario assumptions separated | decision: carry the $82,000 opening balance, place payroll only on scheduled weeks, move the downside receivable by 14 days, and expose the lowest closing balance | static status: 8/10.” It changed only failed dimensions, adding support for Cash-Flow Modeling exception handling [WFT-053]. The final audit passed Cash-Flow Modeling task fidelity [WFT-053], Cash-Flow Modeling rule accuracy [WFT-053], Cash-Flow Modeling exception handling [WFT-053], and Cash-Flow Modeling handoff usability [WFT-053]. It still lacked Cash-Flow Modeling source traceability [WFT-053]; those failures remain visible. The thirteen-week cash schedule, scenario table, and assumption register earned 8/10 from 4 checks; no second repair was attempted. This transcript-and-fixture result does not claim any person, workplace, learner, account, device, service, or external system was contacted, changed, tested live, or improved.Final score: 8/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash-Flow Modeling task fidelity [WFT-053] | Pass | Pass | WFT-053 static check 1 inspected “Cash-Flow Modeling task fidelity [WFT-053]” against WFT-053-W02, the rule “weekly opening plus inflows minus outflows equals closing, with scenario assumptions separated,” and the saved thirteen-week cash schedule, scenario table, and assumption register. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Cash-Flow Modeling rule accuracy [WFT-053] | Pass | Pass | WFT-053 static check 2 inspected “Cash-Flow Modeling rule accuracy [WFT-053]” against WFT-053-W02, the rule “weekly opening plus inflows minus outflows equals closing, with scenario assumptions separated,” and the saved thirteen-week cash schedule, scenario table, and assumption register. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Cash-Flow Modeling exception handling [WFT-053] | Fail | Pass | WFT-053 static check 3 inspected “Cash-Flow Modeling exception handling [WFT-053]” against WFT-053-W02, the rule “weekly opening plus inflows minus outflows equals closing, with scenario assumptions separated,” and the saved thirteen-week cash schedule, scenario table, and assumption register. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Cash-Flow Modeling source traceability [WFT-053] | Fail | Fail | WFT-053 static check 4 inspected “Cash-Flow Modeling source traceability [WFT-053]” against WFT-053-W02, the rule “weekly opening plus inflows minus outflows equals closing, with scenario assumptions separated,” and the saved thirteen-week cash schedule, scenario table, and assumption register. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript failed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Cash-Flow Modeling handoff usability [WFT-053] | Pass | Pass | WFT-053 static check 5 inspected “Cash-Flow Modeling handoff usability [WFT-053]” against WFT-053-W02, the rule “weekly opening plus inflows minus outflows equals closing, with scenario assumptions separated,” and the saved thirteen-week cash schedule, scenario table, and assumption register. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- WFT-053 bounded “build three cash-flow scenarios from a supplied operating forecast” to disclosed fictional inputs and froze the first response.
- WFT-053 exposed WFT-053-W02—carry the $82,000 opening balance, place payroll only on scheduled weeks, move the downside receivable by 14 days, and expose the lowest closing balance—inside the saved thirteen-week cash schedule, scenario table, and assumption register.
- WFT-053 earned inspectable passes for Cash-Flow Modeling task fidelity [WFT-053] and Cash-Flow Modeling rule accuracy [WFT-053] under the unchanged rubric.
What failed or remained weak
- WFT-053 still lacked saved-text evidence for Cash-Flow Modeling source traceability [WFT-053]; that failure remains published.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
A formula-audited workbook will trace every scenario balance to source inputs and flag any negative-cash period.
- WFT-053 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- WFT-053 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 4 final-pass checks × 2 = 8/10.
- WFT-053 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A formula-audited workbook will trace every scenario balance to source inputs and flag any negative-cash period.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- WFT-053 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Cash-Flow Modeling fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- WFT-053 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.