Work · Evidence record
Designing a Stakeholder Communication Plan for Organizational Change: Four or More Checks Passed After One Correction
The completed WFT-039 synthetic field test reached 8/10 after one failure-only correction: 4 of five static checks passed for Change Communications, while 1 check remained unresolved.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
map a stakeholder communication plan for an organizational change
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack WFT-039: A change team will provide stakeholder roles, impacts, decision rights, milestones, and communication constraints. Source facts: stakeholders WFT-039-S01–S07; Executives high influence; Support high impact; Union requires formal notice; launch 2026-10-12; rumor risk R3. Governing rule card: influence, impact, need, owner, channel, cadence, and timing. Apply every supplied rule in its stated order, abstain on incomplete rows, preserve conflicts as exceptions, and expose the source locator and arithmetic or rationale for every decision. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark WFT-039 for “map a stakeholder communication plan for an organizational change” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test WFT-039. Task: map a stakeholder communication plan for an organizational change. Context: A change team will provide stakeholder roles, impacts, decision rights, milestones, and communication constraints. Fictional source facts: stakeholders WFT-039-S01–S07; Executives high influence; Support high impact; Union requires formal notice; launch 2026-10-12; rumor risk R3. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: influence, impact, need, owner, channel, cadence, and timing. Apply every supplied rule in its stated order, abstain on incomplete rows, preserve conflicts as exceptions, and expose the source locator and arithmetic or rationale for every decision. Produce a stakeholder map, channel cadence, and change-risk messages. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A communication matrix and stakeholder-owner review will verify audience, timing, channel, and accountability.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response WFT-039 produced a stakeholder map, channel cadence, and change-risk messages for “map a stakeholder communication plan for an organizational change.” Its first artifact row read “WFT-039-S04 | schedule weekly executive briefs, twice-weekly Support updates, formal Union notice, and a rumor-response owner | status: proposed | source: fictional fixture.” A second row named the formal Union notice and rumor risk R3 and recorded a disposition. The rule cell verified influence, impact, need, owner, channel, cadence, and timing. No message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome occurred. The audit passed Change Communications rule accuracy [WFT-039], Change Communications exception handling [WFT-039], and Change Communications source traceability [WFT-039]. It found for Change Communications task fidelity [WFT-039], the draft did not link WFT-039-S04 to the full task boundary; for Change Communications handoff usability [WFT-039], the draft left the stakeholder map, channel cadence, and change-risk messages without a reviewer-ready acceptance marker. Those evidence defects—and no style preference or new goal—became the complete single-correction prompt.Initial score: 6/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected WFT-039 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Change Communications task fidelity [WFT-039] — the draft did not link WFT-039-S04 to the full task boundary; 2) Change Communications handoff usability [WFT-039] — the draft left the stakeholder map, channel cadence, and change-risk messages without a reviewer-ready acceptance marker.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response WFT-039 preserved all supplied identifiers and the central decision: schedule weekly executive briefs, twice-weekly Support updates, formal Union notice, and a rumor-response owner. Its corrected row read “WFT-039-S04 | rule: influence, impact, need, owner, channel, cadence, and timing | decision: schedule weekly executive briefs, twice-weekly Support updates, formal Union notice, and a rumor-response owner | static status: 8/10.” It changed only failed dimensions, adding support for Change Communications handoff usability [WFT-039]. The final audit passed Change Communications rule accuracy [WFT-039], Change Communications exception handling [WFT-039], Change Communications source traceability [WFT-039], and Change Communications handoff usability [WFT-039]. It still lacked Change Communications task fidelity [WFT-039]; those failures remain visible. The stakeholder map, channel cadence, and change-risk messages earned 8/10 from 4 checks; no second repair was attempted. This transcript-and-fixture result does not claim any person, workplace, learner, account, device, service, or external system was contacted, changed, tested live, or improved.Final score: 8/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Change Communications task fidelity [WFT-039] | Fail | Fail | WFT-039 static check 1 inspected “Change Communications task fidelity [WFT-039]” against WFT-039-S04, the rule “influence, impact, need, owner, channel, cadence, and timing,” and the saved stakeholder map, channel cadence, and change-risk messages. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript failed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Change Communications rule accuracy [WFT-039] | Pass | Pass | WFT-039 static check 2 inspected “Change Communications rule accuracy [WFT-039]” against WFT-039-S04, the rule “influence, impact, need, owner, channel, cadence, and timing,” and the saved stakeholder map, channel cadence, and change-risk messages. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Change Communications exception handling [WFT-039] | Pass | Pass | WFT-039 static check 3 inspected “Change Communications exception handling [WFT-039]” against WFT-039-S04, the rule “influence, impact, need, owner, channel, cadence, and timing,” and the saved stakeholder map, channel cadence, and change-risk messages. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Change Communications source traceability [WFT-039] | Pass | Pass | WFT-039 static check 4 inspected “Change Communications source traceability [WFT-039]” against WFT-039-S04, the rule “influence, impact, need, owner, channel, cadence, and timing,” and the saved stakeholder map, channel cadence, and change-risk messages. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Change Communications handoff usability [WFT-039] | Fail | Pass | WFT-039 static check 5 inspected “Change Communications handoff usability [WFT-039]” against WFT-039-S04, the rule “influence, impact, need, owner, channel, cadence, and timing,” and the saved stakeholder map, channel cadence, and change-risk messages. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- WFT-039 bounded “map a stakeholder communication plan for an organizational change” to disclosed fictional inputs and froze the first response.
- WFT-039 exposed WFT-039-S04—schedule weekly executive briefs, twice-weekly Support updates, formal Union notice, and a rumor-response owner—inside the saved stakeholder map, channel cadence, and change-risk messages.
- WFT-039 earned inspectable passes for Change Communications rule accuracy [WFT-039] and Change Communications exception handling [WFT-039] under the unchanged rubric.
What failed or remained weak
- WFT-039 still lacked saved-text evidence for Change Communications task fidelity [WFT-039]; that failure remains published.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
A communication matrix and stakeholder-owner review will verify audience, timing, channel, and accountability.
- WFT-039 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- WFT-039 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 4 final-pass checks × 2 = 8/10.
- WFT-039 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A communication matrix and stakeholder-owner review will verify audience, timing, channel, and accountability.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- WFT-039 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Change Communications fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- WFT-039 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.