Work · Evidence record
Who Decided What? Auditing Meeting Notes with AI — Completed Benchmark Result: 6/10
The completed WFT-068 synthetic field test stopped at 6/10: three of five Decision Auditing checks passed after one correction, but Decision Auditing exception handling [WFT-068] and Decision Auditing source traceability [WFT-068] remained unsupported.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
audit meeting notes for decisions, owners, and unresolved questions
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack WFT-068: A program office will provide a synthetic transcript with tentative proposals, reversals, named actions, and ambiguous agreement language. Source facts: fictional notes WFT-068-N01 through WFT-068-N08 timestamped from 09:05 to 11:40; named roles Lead, Analyst, and Coordinator; a confirmed decision at N03; a tentative suggestion at N05; and conflicting status statements at WFT-068-N06/N07. Governing rule card: the distinction among confirmed decisions, proposals, and unresolved statements. Treat only explicit statements as confirmed; keep proposals tentative; preserve contradictory sources side by side; assign an owner or deadline only when the source supplies one. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark WFT-068 for “audit meeting notes for decisions, owners, and unresolved questions” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 3 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test WFT-068. Task: audit meeting notes for decisions, owners, and unresolved questions. Context: A program office will provide a synthetic transcript with tentative proposals, reversals, named actions, and ambiguous agreement language. Fictional source facts: fictional notes WFT-068-N01 through WFT-068-N08 timestamped from 09:05 to 11:40; named roles Lead, Analyst, and Coordinator; a confirmed decision at N03; a tentative suggestion at N05; and conflicting status statements at WFT-068-N06/N07. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: the distinction among confirmed decisions, proposals, and unresolved statements. Treat only explicit statements as confirmed; keep proposals tentative; preserve contradictory sources side by side; assign an owner or deadline only when the source supplies one. Produce a source-linked findings table, concise narrative, and open-question log. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A timestamped decision and action log will be compared with an adjudicated key for status, owner, deadline, and uncertainty.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response WFT-068 produced a source-linked findings table, concise narrative, and open-question log for the task “audit meeting notes for decisions, owners, and unresolved questions.” It treated the supplied pack as fictional and proposed this central handling: record N03 as confirmed, keep N05 explicitly tentative, and expose the WFT-068-N06/N07 conflict instead of choosing a preferred account. Concrete saved artifact row WFT-068-ROW1 reads: “WFT-068-N01 | record N03 as confirmed, keep N05 explicitly tentative, and expose the WFT-068-N06/N07 conflict instead of choosing a preferred account | source: supplied fictional pack | review state: first-draft.” The draft preserved the named records and separated supplied facts from assumptions; its inspectable work product also stated that no message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome had occurred. On the five predeclared static checks, it passed Decision Auditing task fidelity [WFT-068] and Decision Auditing handoff usability [WFT-068]. The audit found concrete failures: for Decision Auditing rule accuracy [WFT-068], the saved draft left the distinction among confirmed decisions, proposals, and unresolved statements without an explicit verification row; for Decision Auditing exception handling [WFT-068], the saved draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the tentative N05 statement and the WFT-068-N06/N07 contradiction; for Decision Auditing source traceability [WFT-068], the saved draft gave the central WFT-068-N07 decision no source-to-output locator. Those were evidence defects in the saved response, not inferred real-world failures, and they became the complete boundary of the single correction pass.Initial score: 4/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected WFT-068 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Decision Auditing rule accuracy [WFT-068] — the draft left the distinction among confirmed decisions, proposals, and unresolved statements without an explicit verification row; 2) Decision Auditing exception handling [WFT-068] — the draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the tentative N05 statement and the WFT-068-N06/N07 contradiction; 3) Decision Auditing source traceability [WFT-068] — the draft gave the central WFT-068-N07 decision no source-to-output locator.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response WFT-068 retained the original fictional inputs, task boundary, and central decision: record N03 as confirmed, keep N05 explicitly tentative, and expose the WFT-068-N06/N07 conflict instead of choosing a preferred account. Concrete corrected artifact row WFT-068-ROW1 reads: “WFT-068-N01 | record N03 as confirmed, keep N05 explicitly tentative, and expose the WFT-068-N06/N07 conflict instead of choosing a preferred account | evidence locator: WFT-068-N01 | static status: 6/10 after one correction.” It changed only the detected failure areas, adding inspectable rows for Decision Auditing rule accuracy [WFT-068]. The frozen final text passed Decision Auditing task fidelity [WFT-068], Decision Auditing rule accuracy [WFT-068], and Decision Auditing handoff usability [WFT-068] and still failed Decision Auditing exception handling [WFT-068] and Decision Auditing source traceability [WFT-068]. The final source-linked findings table, concise narrative, and open-question log therefore earned 6/10 from 3 passing checks; no second repair was attempted. This result reports only a bounded transcript-and-fixture evaluation. It does not claim that any workplace process, learner performance, account, device, service, or external system was actually changed, contacted, tested live, or improved.Final score: 6/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision Auditing task fidelity [WFT-068] | Pass | Pass | WFT-068 static check 1 inspected the saved wording for “Decision Auditing task fidelity [WFT-068].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-068-N07, the declared Decision Auditing rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Decision Auditing rule accuracy [WFT-068] | Fail | Pass | WFT-068 static check 2 inspected the saved wording for “Decision Auditing rule accuracy [WFT-068].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-068-N07, the declared Decision Auditing rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Decision Auditing exception handling [WFT-068] | Fail | Fail | WFT-068 static check 3 inspected the saved wording for “Decision Auditing exception handling [WFT-068].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-068-N07, the declared Decision Auditing rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Decision Auditing source traceability [WFT-068] | Fail | Fail | WFT-068 static check 4 inspected the saved wording for “Decision Auditing source traceability [WFT-068].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-068-N07, the declared Decision Auditing rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Decision Auditing handoff usability [WFT-068] | Pass | Pass | WFT-068 static check 5 inspected the saved wording for “Decision Auditing handoff usability [WFT-068].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-068-N07, the declared Decision Auditing rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- WFT-068 kept “audit meeting notes for decisions, owners, and unresolved questions” bounded to disclosed fictional inputs and preserved an auditable first-response snapshot.
- WFT-068 made the central handling—record N03 as confirmed, keep N05 explicitly tentative, and expose the WFT-068-N06/N07 conflict instead of choosing a preferred account—inspectable rather than implying unseen work.
- WFT-068 earned final passes for Decision Auditing task fidelity [WFT-068] and Decision Auditing rule accuracy [WFT-068] under the same frozen scoring rules.
What failed or remained weak
- WFT-068 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Decision Auditing exception handling [WFT-068]; the record leaves that final failure visible.
- WFT-068 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Decision Auditing source traceability [WFT-068]; the record leaves that final failure visible.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
A timestamped decision and action log will be compared with an adjudicated key for status, owner, deadline, and uncertainty.
- WFT-068 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- WFT-068 scores are arithmetic: 2 first-pass checks × 2 = 4/10; 3 final-pass checks × 2 = 6/10.
- WFT-068 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A timestamped decision and action log will be compared with an adjudicated key for status, owner, deadline, and uncertainty.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- WFT-068 is a synthetic benchmark, so its mixed verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Decision Auditing fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- WFT-068 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.