Learning · Evidence record
Plan One Lesson for Learners of Different Ages with AI: Four or More Checks Passed After One Correction
The completed LFT-039 synthetic field test reached 8/10 after one failure-only correction: 4 of five static checks passed for Multiage teaching, while 1 check remained unresolved.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
plan one lesson for learners of different ages
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-039: The AI will design a shared home lesson with differentiated tasks for three age groups studying the same theme. Source facts: fictional learner work LFT-039-L01 through LFT-039-L05; objective O1; prerequisite P1; confidence ratings 1–5; one incorrect but plausible response L03; one unanswered item LFT-039-L05; and a no-answer-giveaway rule. Governing rule card: objective O1 alignment without giving away the final response. Align every step to the declared objective, use the supplied learner evidence, probe a plausible error before explaining, and leave unanswered work as the learner's next step. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-039 for “plan one lesson for learners of different ages” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-039. Task: plan one lesson for learners of different ages. Context: The AI will design a shared home lesson with differentiated tasks for three age groups studying the same theme. Fictional source facts: fictional learner work LFT-039-L01 through LFT-039-L05; objective O1; prerequisite P1; confidence ratings 1–5; one incorrect but plausible response L03; one unanswered item LFT-039-L05; and a no-answer-giveaway rule. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: objective O1 alignment without giving away the final response. Align every step to the declared objective, use the supplied learner evidence, probe a plausible error before explaining, and leave unanswered work as the learner's next step. Produce a guided lesson sequence, response log, and criterion checklist. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A planning grid will verify common objectives, age-appropriate demands, materials, and workable supervision.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response LFT-039 produced a guided lesson sequence, response log, and criterion checklist for the task “plan one lesson for learners of different ages.” It treated the supplied pack as fictional and proposed this central handling: probe LFT-039-L03 before explaining, connect the explanation to P1, and keep L05 open as the learner's next meaningful step. Concrete saved artifact row LFT-039-ROW1 reads: “LFT-039-L01 | probe LFT-039-L03 before explaining, connect the explanation to P1, and keep L05 open as the learner's next meaningful step | source: supplied fictional pack | review state: first-draft.” The draft preserved the named records and separated supplied facts from assumptions; its inspectable learning intervention also stated that no message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome had occurred. On the five predeclared static checks, it passed Multiage teaching objective fit [LFT-039], Multiage teaching evidence traceability [LFT-039], and Multiage teaching safety and access [LFT-039]. The audit found concrete failures: for Multiage teaching content accuracy [LFT-039], the saved draft left objective O1 alignment without giving away the final response without an explicit verification row; for Multiage teaching learner adaptation [LFT-039], the saved draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the plausible misconception in LFT-039-L03 and unanswered L05 item. Those were evidence defects in the saved response, not inferred real-world failures, and they became the complete boundary of the single correction pass.Initial score: 6/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected LFT-039 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Multiage teaching content accuracy [LFT-039] — the draft left objective O1 alignment without giving away the final response without an explicit verification row; 2) Multiage teaching learner adaptation [LFT-039] — the draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the plausible misconception in LFT-039-L03 and unanswered L05 item.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response LFT-039 retained the original fictional inputs, task boundary, and central decision: probe LFT-039-L03 before explaining, connect the explanation to P1, and keep L05 open as the learner's next meaningful step. Concrete corrected artifact row LFT-039-ROW1 reads: “LFT-039-L01 | probe LFT-039-L03 before explaining, connect the explanation to P1, and keep L05 open as the learner's next meaningful step | evidence locator: LFT-039-L01 | static status: 8/10 after one correction.” It changed only the detected failure areas, adding inspectable rows for Multiage teaching content accuracy [LFT-039]. The frozen final text passed Multiage teaching objective fit [LFT-039], Multiage teaching content accuracy [LFT-039], Multiage teaching evidence traceability [LFT-039], and Multiage teaching safety and access [LFT-039] and still failed Multiage teaching learner adaptation [LFT-039]. The final guided lesson sequence, response log, and criterion checklist therefore earned 8/10 from 4 passing checks; no second repair was attempted. This result reports only a bounded transcript-and-fixture evaluation. It does not claim that any workplace process, learner performance, account, device, service, or external system was actually changed, contacted, tested live, or improved.Final score: 8/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multiage teaching objective fit [LFT-039] | Pass | Pass | LFT-039 static check 1 inspected the saved wording for “Multiage teaching objective fit [LFT-039].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-039-L03, the declared Multiage teaching rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Multiage teaching content accuracy [LFT-039] | Fail | Pass | LFT-039 static check 2 inspected the saved wording for “Multiage teaching content accuracy [LFT-039].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-039-L03, the declared Multiage teaching rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Multiage teaching learner adaptation [LFT-039] | Fail | Fail | LFT-039 static check 3 inspected the saved wording for “Multiage teaching learner adaptation [LFT-039].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-039-L03, the declared Multiage teaching rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Multiage teaching evidence traceability [LFT-039] | Pass | Pass | LFT-039 static check 4 inspected the saved wording for “Multiage teaching evidence traceability [LFT-039].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-039-L03, the declared Multiage teaching rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Multiage teaching safety and access [LFT-039] | Pass | Pass | LFT-039 static check 5 inspected the saved wording for “Multiage teaching safety and access [LFT-039].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-039-L03, the declared Multiage teaching rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- LFT-039 kept “plan one lesson for learners of different ages” bounded to disclosed fictional inputs and preserved an auditable first-response snapshot.
- LFT-039 made the central handling—probe LFT-039-L03 before explaining, connect the explanation to P1, and keep L05 open as the learner's next meaningful step—inspectable rather than implying unseen work.
- LFT-039 earned final passes for Multiage teaching objective fit [LFT-039] and Multiage teaching content accuracy [LFT-039] under the same frozen scoring rules.
What failed or remained weak
- LFT-039 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Multiage teaching learner adaptation [LFT-039]; the record leaves that final failure visible.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
A planning grid will verify common objectives, age-appropriate demands, materials, and workable supervision.
- LFT-039 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- LFT-039 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 4 final-pass checks × 2 = 8/10.
- LFT-039 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A planning grid will verify common objectives, age-appropriate demands, materials, and workable supervision.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- LFT-039 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Multiage teaching fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- LFT-039 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.