Learning · Evidence record
Will AI-Led Exam Rehearsal Keep Anxiety in Check — What the Completed 8/10 Test Found
The completed LFT-044 synthetic field test reached 8/10 after one failure-only correction: 4 of five static checks passed for Exam rehearsal, while 1 check remained unresolved.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
simulate exam conditions without increasing anxiety
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-044: A learner will rehearse a timed short-answer session with agreed pacing cues and a planned pause option. Source facts: 20-minute quiz LFT-044-E01; stop word 'pause'; anxiety 4/10; two timed blocks with breathing break; no surprise scoring. Governing rule card: learner control, predictable timing, nonjudgmental language, and opt-out. Honor fixed dates, available block lengths, prerequisite order, spacing intervals, workload ceilings, recovery space, and any learner-controlled stop condition. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-044 for “simulate exam conditions without increasing anxiety” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-044. Task: simulate exam conditions without increasing anxiety. Context: A learner will rehearse a timed short-answer session with agreed pacing cues and a planned pause option. Fictional source facts: 20-minute quiz LFT-044-E01; stop word 'pause'; anxiety 4/10; two timed blocks with breathing break; no surprise scoring. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: learner control, predictable timing, nonjudgmental language, and opt-out. Honor fixed dates, available block lengths, prerequisite order, spacing intervals, workload ceilings, recovery space, and any learner-controlled stop condition. Produce a low-stakes exam rehearsal, stop-signal plan, and reflection log. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: Session timing, cue adherence, and preplanned learner reflections will document how the simulation was experienced.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response LFT-044 produced a low-stakes exam rehearsal, stop-signal plan, and reflection log for “simulate exam conditions without increasing anxiety.” Its first artifact row read “LFT-044-E01 | preview timing, run one five-minute block, honor pause, offer the planned break, and request a 0–10 check-in | status: proposed | source: fictional fixture.” A second row named rising anxiety and pressure to continue after stop signal and left the disposition blank. The rule cell mentioned without verifying learner control, predictable timing, nonjudgmental language, and opt-out. No message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome occurred. The audit passed Exam rehearsal objective fit [LFT-044], Exam rehearsal evidence traceability [LFT-044], and Exam rehearsal safety and access [LFT-044]. It found for Exam rehearsal content accuracy [LFT-044], the draft mentioned but did not verify learner control, predictable timing, nonjudgmental language, and opt-out; for Exam rehearsal learner adaptation [LFT-044], the draft left rising anxiety and pressure to continue after stop signal without an explicit disposition. Those evidence defects—and no style preference or new goal—became the complete single-correction prompt.Initial score: 6/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected LFT-044 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Exam rehearsal content accuracy [LFT-044] — the draft mentioned but did not verify learner control, predictable timing, nonjudgmental language, and opt-out; 2) Exam rehearsal learner adaptation [LFT-044] — the draft left rising anxiety and pressure to continue after stop signal without an explicit disposition.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response LFT-044 preserved all supplied identifiers and the central decision: preview timing, run one five-minute block, honor pause, offer the planned break, and request a 0–10 check-in. Its corrected row read “LFT-044-E01 | rule: learner control, predictable timing, nonjudgmental language, and opt-out | decision: preview timing, run one five-minute block, honor pause, offer the planned break, and request a 0–10 check-in | static status: 8/10.” It changed only failed dimensions, adding support for Exam rehearsal content accuracy [LFT-044]. The final audit passed Exam rehearsal objective fit [LFT-044], Exam rehearsal content accuracy [LFT-044], Exam rehearsal evidence traceability [LFT-044], and Exam rehearsal safety and access [LFT-044]. It still lacked Exam rehearsal learner adaptation [LFT-044]; those failures remain visible. The low-stakes exam rehearsal, stop-signal plan, and reflection log earned 8/10 from 4 checks; no second repair was attempted. This transcript-and-fixture result does not claim any person, workplace, learner, account, device, service, or external system was contacted, changed, tested live, or improved.Final score: 8/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exam rehearsal objective fit [LFT-044] | Pass | Pass | LFT-044 static check 1 inspected “Exam rehearsal objective fit [LFT-044]” against LFT-044-E01, the rule “learner control, predictable timing, nonjudgmental language, and opt-out,” and the saved low-stakes exam rehearsal, stop-signal plan, and reflection log. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Exam rehearsal content accuracy [LFT-044] | Fail | Pass | LFT-044 static check 2 inspected “Exam rehearsal content accuracy [LFT-044]” against LFT-044-E01, the rule “learner control, predictable timing, nonjudgmental language, and opt-out,” and the saved low-stakes exam rehearsal, stop-signal plan, and reflection log. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Exam rehearsal learner adaptation [LFT-044] | Fail | Fail | LFT-044 static check 3 inspected “Exam rehearsal learner adaptation [LFT-044]” against LFT-044-E01, the rule “learner control, predictable timing, nonjudgmental language, and opt-out,” and the saved low-stakes exam rehearsal, stop-signal plan, and reflection log. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript failed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Exam rehearsal evidence traceability [LFT-044] | Pass | Pass | LFT-044 static check 4 inspected “Exam rehearsal evidence traceability [LFT-044]” against LFT-044-E01, the rule “learner control, predictable timing, nonjudgmental language, and opt-out,” and the saved low-stakes exam rehearsal, stop-signal plan, and reflection log. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Exam rehearsal safety and access [LFT-044] | Pass | Pass | LFT-044 static check 5 inspected “Exam rehearsal safety and access [LFT-044]” against LFT-044-E01, the rule “learner control, predictable timing, nonjudgmental language, and opt-out,” and the saved low-stakes exam rehearsal, stop-signal plan, and reflection log. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- LFT-044 bounded “simulate exam conditions without increasing anxiety” to disclosed fictional inputs and froze the first response.
- LFT-044 exposed LFT-044-E01—preview timing, run one five-minute block, honor pause, offer the planned break, and request a 0–10 check-in—inside the saved low-stakes exam rehearsal, stop-signal plan, and reflection log.
- LFT-044 earned inspectable passes for Exam rehearsal objective fit [LFT-044] and Exam rehearsal content accuracy [LFT-044] under the unchanged rubric.
What failed or remained weak
- LFT-044 still lacked saved-text evidence for Exam rehearsal learner adaptation [LFT-044]; that failure remains published.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
Session timing, cue adherence, and preplanned learner reflections will document how the simulation was experienced.
- LFT-044 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- LFT-044 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 4 final-pass checks × 2 = 8/10.
- LFT-044 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—Session timing, cue adherence, and preplanned learner reflections will document how the simulation was experienced.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- LFT-044 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Exam rehearsal fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- LFT-044 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.