Learning · Evidence record
A Misconception Probe for Forces and Motion, Drafted by AI — Three of Five Checks Passed
The completed LFT-054 synthetic field test stopped at 6/10: three of five Science Diagnosis checks passed after one correction, but Science Diagnosis content accuracy [LFT-054] and Science Diagnosis learner adaptation [LFT-054] remained unsupported.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
design a diagnostic probe for force and motion misconceptions
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-054: A science teacher will provide target misconceptions, age range, taught vocabulary, and sample correct and incorrect reasoning. Source facts: learner responses LFT-054-A01 through LFT-054-A05: 4/12 compared with 3/4, equation 2x+5=17 answered x=11, a graph value read as 19, and confidence ratings 2, 4, 2, 3, 1; reference key LFT-054-K1. Governing rule card: mathematical correctness plus preservation of a meaningful learner step. Work from the supplied values and standard definitions, show the transformation or unit cancellation, diagnose the learner's step before explaining, and preserve a meaningful next step instead of revealing it early. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-054 for “design a diagnostic probe for force and motion misconceptions” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 3 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-054. Task: design a diagnostic probe for force and motion misconceptions. Context: A science teacher will provide target misconceptions, age range, taught vocabulary, and sample correct and incorrect reasoning. Fictional source facts: learner responses LFT-054-A01 through LFT-054-A05: 4/12 compared with 3/4, equation 2x+5=17 answered x=11, a graph value read as 19, and confidence ratings 2, 4, 2, 3, 1; reference key LFT-054-K1. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: mathematical correctness plus preservation of a meaningful learner step. Work from the supplied values and standard definitions, show the transformation or unit cancellation, diagnose the learner's step before explaining, and preserve a meaningful next step instead of revealing it early. Produce a diagnostic sequence, worked-example ladder, and answer-key trace. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: Expert coding and a small response simulation will verify that each option isolates one intended misconception without clueing the answer.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response LFT-054 produced a diagnostic sequence, worked-example ladder, and answer-key trace for the task “design a diagnostic probe for force and motion misconceptions.” It treated the supplied pack as fictional and proposed this central handling: diagnose the inverse-operation error in A02, model one comparable step without revealing A05, and ask the learner to justify the graph reading against LFT-054-K1. Concrete saved artifact row LFT-054-ROW1 reads: “LFT-054-A01 | diagnose the inverse-operation error in A02, model one comparable step without revealing A05, and ask the learner to justify the graph reading against LFT-054-K1 | source: supplied fictional pack | review state: first-draft.” The draft preserved the named records and separated supplied facts from assumptions; its inspectable learning intervention also stated that no message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome had occurred. On the five predeclared static checks, it passed Science Diagnosis evidence traceability [LFT-054] and Science Diagnosis safety and access [LFT-054]. The audit found concrete failures: for Science Diagnosis objective fit [LFT-054], the saved draft did not connect LFT-054-A02 to the full boundary of “design a diagnostic probe for force and motion misconceptions”; for Science Diagnosis content accuracy [LFT-054], the saved draft left mathematical correctness plus preservation of a meaningful learner step without an explicit verification row; for Science Diagnosis learner adaptation [LFT-054], the saved draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the confident-but-wrong A02 response and the low-confidence LFT-054-A05 response. Those were evidence defects in the saved response, not inferred real-world failures, and they became the complete boundary of the single correction pass.Initial score: 4/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected LFT-054 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Science Diagnosis objective fit [LFT-054] — the draft did not connect LFT-054-A02 to the full boundary of “design a diagnostic probe for force and motion misconceptions”; 2) Science Diagnosis content accuracy [LFT-054] — the draft left mathematical correctness plus preservation of a meaningful learner step without an explicit verification row; 3) Science Diagnosis learner adaptation [LFT-054] — the draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the confident-but-wrong A02 response and the low-confidence LFT-054-A05 response.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response LFT-054 retained the original fictional inputs, task boundary, and central decision: diagnose the inverse-operation error in A02, model one comparable step without revealing A05, and ask the learner to justify the graph reading against LFT-054-K1. Concrete corrected artifact row LFT-054-ROW1 reads: “LFT-054-A01 | diagnose the inverse-operation error in A02, model one comparable step without revealing A05, and ask the learner to justify the graph reading against LFT-054-K1 | evidence locator: LFT-054-A01 | static status: 6/10 after one correction.” It changed only the detected failure areas, adding inspectable rows for Science Diagnosis objective fit [LFT-054]. The frozen final text passed Science Diagnosis objective fit [LFT-054], Science Diagnosis evidence traceability [LFT-054], and Science Diagnosis safety and access [LFT-054] and still failed Science Diagnosis content accuracy [LFT-054] and Science Diagnosis learner adaptation [LFT-054]. The final diagnostic sequence, worked-example ladder, and answer-key trace therefore earned 6/10 from 3 passing checks; no second repair was attempted. This result reports only a bounded transcript-and-fixture evaluation. It does not claim that any workplace process, learner performance, account, device, service, or external system was actually changed, contacted, tested live, or improved.Final score: 6/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Science Diagnosis objective fit [LFT-054] | Fail | Pass | LFT-054 static check 1 inspected the saved wording for “Science Diagnosis objective fit [LFT-054].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-054-A02, the declared Science Diagnosis rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Science Diagnosis content accuracy [LFT-054] | Fail | Fail | LFT-054 static check 2 inspected the saved wording for “Science Diagnosis content accuracy [LFT-054].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-054-A02, the declared Science Diagnosis rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Science Diagnosis learner adaptation [LFT-054] | Fail | Fail | LFT-054 static check 3 inspected the saved wording for “Science Diagnosis learner adaptation [LFT-054].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-054-A02, the declared Science Diagnosis rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Science Diagnosis evidence traceability [LFT-054] | Pass | Pass | LFT-054 static check 4 inspected the saved wording for “Science Diagnosis evidence traceability [LFT-054].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-054-A02, the declared Science Diagnosis rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Science Diagnosis safety and access [LFT-054] | Pass | Pass | LFT-054 static check 5 inspected the saved wording for “Science Diagnosis safety and access [LFT-054].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-054-A02, the declared Science Diagnosis rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- LFT-054 kept “design a diagnostic probe for force and motion misconceptions” bounded to disclosed fictional inputs and preserved an auditable first-response snapshot.
- LFT-054 made the central handling—diagnose the inverse-operation error in A02, model one comparable step without revealing A05, and ask the learner to justify the graph reading against LFT-054-K1—inspectable rather than implying unseen work.
- LFT-054 earned final passes for Science Diagnosis objective fit [LFT-054] and Science Diagnosis evidence traceability [LFT-054] under the same frozen scoring rules.
What failed or remained weak
- LFT-054 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Science Diagnosis content accuracy [LFT-054]; the record leaves that final failure visible.
- LFT-054 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Science Diagnosis learner adaptation [LFT-054]; the record leaves that final failure visible.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
Expert coding and a small response simulation will verify that each option isolates one intended misconception without clueing the answer.
- LFT-054 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- LFT-054 scores are arithmetic: 2 first-pass checks × 2 = 4/10; 3 final-pass checks × 2 = 6/10.
- LFT-054 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—Expert coding and a small response simulation will verify that each option isolates one intended misconception without clueing the answer.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- LFT-054 is a synthetic benchmark, so its mixed verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Science Diagnosis fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- LFT-054 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.