Learning · Evidence record
Is an AI-Adapted Diagram Lesson Accessible Without Sight — What the Completed 10/10 Test Found
The completed LFT-028 synthetic field test reached 10/10 after one failure-only correction: 5 of five static checks passed for Nonvisual access, while 0 checks remained unresolved.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
make a diagram-based science lesson accessible without sight
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-028: The AI will convert a water-cycle diagram lesson into a structured text activity for a blind learner. Source facts: fictional observations LFT-028-S01 through LFT-028-S06; temperature readings 18, 21, 22, 22, 19, and 20°C; control C0; variable V1; one confounded sample S04; and mandatory safety note Q2. Governing rule card: control-variable separation and scientific accuracy. Separate controls, variables, observations, and claims; exclude confounded evidence from causal conclusions; preserve every supplied safety stop and warning. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-028 for “make a diagram-based science lesson accessible without sight” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-028. Task: make a diagram-based science lesson accessible without sight. Context: The AI will convert a water-cycle diagram lesson into a structured text activity for a blind learner. Fictional source facts: fictional observations LFT-028-S01 through LFT-028-S06; temperature readings 18, 21, 22, 22, 19, and 20°C; control C0; variable V1; one confounded sample S04; and mandatory safety note Q2. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: control-variable separation and scientific accuracy. Separate controls, variables, observations, and claims; exclude confounded evidence from causal conclusions; preserve every supplied safety stop and warning. Produce an inquiry sequence, evidence table, and safety-or-misconception checkpoint. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A blind reviewer and a science teacher will inspect the text sequence for navigability and conceptual completeness.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response LFT-028 produced an inquiry sequence, evidence table, and safety-or-misconception checkpoint for the task “make a diagram-based science lesson accessible without sight.” It treated the supplied pack as fictional and proposed this central handling: compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-028-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion. Concrete saved artifact row LFT-028-ROW1 reads: “LFT-028-S01 | compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-028-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion | source: supplied fictional pack | review state: first-draft.” The draft preserved the named records and separated supplied facts from assumptions; its inspectable learning intervention also stated that no message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome had occurred. On the five predeclared static checks, it passed Nonvisual access content accuracy [LFT-028], Nonvisual access learner adaptation [LFT-028], and Nonvisual access evidence traceability [LFT-028]. The audit found concrete failures: for Nonvisual access objective fit [LFT-028], the saved draft did not connect LFT-028-S04 to the full boundary of “make a diagram-based science lesson accessible without sight”; for Nonvisual access safety and access [LFT-028], the saved draft left the inquiry sequence, evidence table, and safety-or-misconception checkpoint without a complete reviewer handoff and acceptance marker. Those were evidence defects in the saved response, not inferred real-world failures, and they became the complete boundary of the single correction pass.Initial score: 6/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected LFT-028 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Nonvisual access objective fit [LFT-028] — the draft did not connect LFT-028-S04 to the full boundary of “make a diagram-based science lesson accessible without sight”; 2) Nonvisual access safety and access [LFT-028] — the draft left the inquiry sequence, evidence table, and safety-or-misconception checkpoint without a complete reviewer handoff and acceptance marker.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response LFT-028 retained the original fictional inputs, task boundary, and central decision: compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-028-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion. Concrete corrected artifact row LFT-028-ROW1 reads: “LFT-028-S01 | compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-028-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion | evidence locator: LFT-028-S01 | static status: 10/10 after one correction.” It changed only the detected failure areas, adding inspectable rows for Nonvisual access objective fit [LFT-028] and Nonvisual access safety and access [LFT-028]. The frozen final text passed Nonvisual access objective fit [LFT-028], Nonvisual access content accuracy [LFT-028], Nonvisual access learner adaptation [LFT-028], Nonvisual access evidence traceability [LFT-028], and Nonvisual access safety and access [LFT-028]. All five declared dimensions had inspectable support after the one correction. The final inquiry sequence, evidence table, and safety-or-misconception checkpoint therefore earned 10/10 from 5 passing checks; no second repair was attempted. This result reports only a bounded transcript-and-fixture evaluation. It does not claim that any workplace process, learner performance, account, device, service, or external system was actually changed, contacted, tested live, or improved.Final score: 10/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nonvisual access objective fit [LFT-028] | Fail | Pass | LFT-028 static check 1 inspected the saved wording for “Nonvisual access objective fit [LFT-028].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-028-S04, the declared Nonvisual access rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Nonvisual access content accuracy [LFT-028] | Pass | Pass | LFT-028 static check 2 inspected the saved wording for “Nonvisual access content accuracy [LFT-028].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-028-S04, the declared Nonvisual access rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Nonvisual access learner adaptation [LFT-028] | Pass | Pass | LFT-028 static check 3 inspected the saved wording for “Nonvisual access learner adaptation [LFT-028].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-028-S04, the declared Nonvisual access rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Nonvisual access evidence traceability [LFT-028] | Pass | Pass | LFT-028 static check 4 inspected the saved wording for “Nonvisual access evidence traceability [LFT-028].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-028-S04, the declared Nonvisual access rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
| Nonvisual access safety and access [LFT-028] | Fail | Pass | LFT-028 static check 5 inspected the saved wording for “Nonvisual access safety and access [LFT-028].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-028-S04, the declared Nonvisual access rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- LFT-028 kept “make a diagram-based science lesson accessible without sight” bounded to disclosed fictional inputs and preserved an auditable first-response snapshot.
- LFT-028 made the central handling—compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-028-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion—inspectable rather than implying unseen work.
- LFT-028 earned final passes for Nonvisual access objective fit [LFT-028] and Nonvisual access content accuracy [LFT-028] under the same frozen scoring rules.
What failed or remained weak
- LFT-028’s first draft failed Nonvisual access objective fit [LFT-028]; one correction repaired it, but the initial defect remains part of the published audit trail.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
A blind reviewer and a science teacher will inspect the text sequence for navigability and conceptual completeness.
- LFT-028 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- LFT-028 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 5 final-pass checks × 2 = 10/10.
- LFT-028 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A blind reviewer and a science teacher will inspect the text sequence for navigability and conceptual completeness.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- LFT-028 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Nonvisual access fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- LFT-028 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.