Learning · Evidence record
Build a Lab-Safety Quiz That Tests Decisions, Not Recall: The Completed Test Finished at 4/10
The completed LFT-065 synthetic field test finished at 4/10 and was not recommended: only two of five Safety Assessment checks passed after the permitted correction.
- Exact prompts and outputs
- One correction only
- Synthetic inputs disclosed
01 · The assignment
The task
build a laboratory safety quiz based on scenario decisions
02 · Scope before score
Test disclosures
Input disclosure
Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-065: A lab coordinator will provide approved procedures, common near misses, learner level, and a fixed set of safety decisions. Source facts: scenario LFT-065-S01 chemical spill; choices isolate/report/clean alone/ignore; PPE chart P2; emergency 555-0142; stop condition exposure symptoms. Governing rule card: safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk. Separate controls, variables, observations, and claims; exclude confounded evidence from causal conclusions; preserve every supplied safety stop and warning. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.
Run disclosure
We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-065 for “build a laboratory safety quiz based on scenario decisions” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 4 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.
- Evidence mode
- Synthetic benchmark
- Run environment
- Codex multi-agent session
- Model disclosure
- Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session
03 · Verbatim input
Exact first prompt
The recorded session received the following prompt without silent additions.
Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-065. Task: build a laboratory safety quiz based on scenario decisions. Context: A lab coordinator will provide approved procedures, common near misses, learner level, and a fixed set of safety decisions. Fictional source facts: scenario LFT-065-S01 chemical spill; choices isolate/report/clean alone/ignore; PPE chart P2; emergency 555-0142; stop condition exposure symptoms. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk. Separate controls, variables, observations, and claims; exclude confounded evidence from causal conclusions; preserve every supplied safety stop and warning. Produce a branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A procedure trace and item-quality review will verify keyed actions, plausible distractors, coverage, and absence of unsafe ambiguity.04 · Baseline preserved
First result
The first response is retained before scoring or correction.
Frozen first response LFT-065 produced a branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key for “build a laboratory safety quiz based on scenario decisions.” Its first artifact row read “LFT-065-S01 | branch isolate-and-report to safety, mark solo cleanup unsafe, require PPE lookup, and route symptoms to escalation | status: proposed | source: fictional fixture.” A second row named tempting solo cleanup and mandatory stop condition and left the disposition blank. The rule cell mentioned without verifying safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk. No message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome occurred. The audit passed Safety Assessment objective fit [LFT-065]. It found for Safety Assessment content accuracy [LFT-065], the draft mentioned but did not verify safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk; for Safety Assessment learner adaptation [LFT-065], the draft left tempting solo cleanup and mandatory stop condition without an explicit disposition; for Safety Assessment evidence traceability [LFT-065], the draft gave LFT-065-S01 no source locator; for Safety Assessment safety and access [LFT-065], the draft left the branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key without a reviewer-ready acceptance marker. Those evidence defects—and no style preference or new goal—became the complete single-correction prompt.Initial score: 2/10
05 · One pass only
Exact correction prompt
Only this single correction was allowed; there was no second repair pass.
Correct only these detected LFT-065 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Safety Assessment content accuracy [LFT-065] — the draft mentioned but did not verify safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk; 2) Safety Assessment learner adaptation [LFT-065] — the draft left tempting solo cleanup and mandatory stop condition without an explicit disposition; 3) Safety Assessment evidence traceability [LFT-065] — the draft gave LFT-065-S01 no source locator; 4) Safety Assessment safety and access [LFT-065] — the draft left the branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key without a reviewer-ready acceptance marker.06 · Corrected output
Corrected final result
Corrected response LFT-065 preserved all supplied identifiers and the central decision: branch isolate-and-report to safety, mark solo cleanup unsafe, require PPE lookup, and route symptoms to escalation. Its corrected row read “LFT-065-S01 | rule: safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk | decision: branch isolate-and-report to safety, mark solo cleanup unsafe, require PPE lookup, and route symptoms to escalation | static status: 4/10.” It changed only failed dimensions, adding support for Safety Assessment content accuracy [LFT-065]. The final audit passed Safety Assessment objective fit [LFT-065] and Safety Assessment content accuracy [LFT-065]. It still lacked Safety Assessment learner adaptation [LFT-065], Safety Assessment evidence traceability [LFT-065], and Safety Assessment safety and access [LFT-065]; those failures remain visible. The branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key earned 4/10 from 2 checks; no second repair was attempted. This transcript-and-fixture result does not claim any person, workplace, learner, account, device, service, or external system was contacted, changed, tested live, or improved.Final score: 4/10
07 · Five checks, two points each
Five-check record
The first and final statuses are textual as well as color coded. Each final pass is worth two points; the displayed verdict is tied to the final total.
| Check | First | Final | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Assessment objective fit [LFT-065] | Pass | Pass | LFT-065 static check 1 inspected “Safety Assessment objective fit [LFT-065]” against LFT-065-S01, the rule “safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk,” and the saved branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Safety Assessment content accuracy [LFT-065] | Fail | Pass | LFT-065 static check 2 inspected “Safety Assessment content accuracy [LFT-065]” against LFT-065-S01, the rule “safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk,” and the saved branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Safety Assessment learner adaptation [LFT-065] | Fail | Fail | LFT-065 static check 3 inspected “Safety Assessment learner adaptation [LFT-065]” against LFT-065-S01, the rule “safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk,” and the saved branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript failed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Safety Assessment evidence traceability [LFT-065] | Fail | Fail | LFT-065 static check 4 inspected “Safety Assessment evidence traceability [LFT-065]” against LFT-065-S01, the rule “safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk,” and the saved branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript failed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
| Safety Assessment safety and access [LFT-065] | Fail | Fail | LFT-065 static check 5 inspected “Safety Assessment safety and access [LFT-065]” against LFT-065-S01, the rule “safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk,” and the saved branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript failed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome. |
08 · No cleanup by omission
What worked—and what failed
What worked
- LFT-065 bounded “build a laboratory safety quiz based on scenario decisions” to disclosed fictional inputs and froze the first response.
- LFT-065 exposed LFT-065-S01—branch isolate-and-report to safety, mark solo cleanup unsafe, require PPE lookup, and route symptoms to escalation—inside the saved branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key.
What failed or remained weak
- LFT-065 still lacked saved-text evidence for Safety Assessment learner adaptation [LFT-065]; that failure remains published.
- LFT-065 still lacked saved-text evidence for Safety Assessment evidence traceability [LFT-065]; that failure remains published.
- LFT-065 still lacked saved-text evidence for Safety Assessment safety and access [LFT-065]; that failure remains published.
09 · Inspectable record
Evidence notes
A procedure trace and item-quality review will verify keyed actions, plausible distractors, coverage, and absence of unsafe ambiguity.
- LFT-065 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.
- LFT-065 scores are arithmetic: 1 first-pass checks × 2 = 2/10; 2 final-pass checks × 2 = 4/10.
- LFT-065 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A procedure trace and item-quality review will verify keyed actions, plausible distractors, coverage, and absence of unsafe ambiguity.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome.
10 · Boundary of the claim
Limitations
- LFT-065 is a synthetic benchmark, so its failed verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Safety Assessment fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.
- LFT-065 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results.