{
  "category": "work",
  "slug": "work-prioritize-sales-leads",
  "title": "Could AI Prioritize Sales Leads from a Written Qualification Policy: The One-Pass Revision Reached 8/10",
  "task": "prioritize inbound sales leads using a written qualification policy",
  "excerpt": "The completed WFT-005 synthetic field test reached 8/10 after one failure-only correction: 4 of five static checks passed for Lead Qualification, while 1 check remained unresolved.",
  "tool": "Codex multi-agent session",
  "model": "Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session",
  "publishedAt": "2026-08-03T14:00:00+08:00",
  "durationMinutes": 0,
  "testMode": "Synthetic benchmark",
  "inputDisclosure": "Synthetic blind-test input pack WFT-005: A sales team will supply prospect records and fixed qualification definitions for a daily follow-up queue. Source facts: six fictional records WFT-005-C01 through WFT-005-C06; policy rules P1–P5; scores 45, 53, 75, 62, 74, and 91; a shared surname on C02/C05; and an incomplete identifier on WFT-005-C04. Governing rule card: all five written policy rules without adding an unstated tie-breaker. Apply the written rules in order; use descending disclosed scores only where ranking is requested; a shared name alone never proves identity; incomplete identifiers require abstention rather than invention. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.",
  "runDisclosure": "We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark WFT-005 for “prioritize inbound sales leads using a written qualification policy” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.",
  "prompt": "Run bounded synthetic field test WFT-005. Task: prioritize inbound sales leads using a written qualification policy. Context: A sales team will supply prospect records and fixed qualification definitions for a daily follow-up queue. Fictional source facts: six fictional records WFT-005-C01 through WFT-005-C06; policy rules P1–P5; scores 45, 53, 75, 62, 74, and 91; a shared surname on C02/C05; and an incomplete identifier on WFT-005-C04. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: all five written policy rules without adding an unstated tie-breaker. Apply the written rules in order; use descending disclosed scores only where ranking is requested; a shared name alone never proves identity; incomplete identifiers require abstention rather than invention. Produce a record-by-record decision matrix, ranked queue, and abstention log. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A ranked queue and a criterion-by-criterion audit will verify every prioritization decision.",
  "firstResult": "Frozen first response WFT-005 produced a record-by-record decision matrix, ranked queue, and abstention log for the task “prioritize inbound sales leads using a written qualification policy.” It treated the supplied pack as fictional and proposed this central handling: rank WFT-005-C06 first under P2, keep C02 and C05 separate despite the shared surname, and abstain on WFT-005-C04 until its identifier can be resolved. Concrete saved artifact row WFT-005-ROW1 reads: “WFT-005-C01 | rank WFT-005-C06 first under P2, keep C02 and C05 separate despite the shared surname, and abstain on WFT-005-C04 until its identifier can be resolved | source: supplied fictional pack | review state: first-draft.” The draft preserved the named records and separated supplied facts from assumptions; its inspectable work product also stated that no message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome had occurred. On the five predeclared static checks, it passed Lead Qualification task fidelity [WFT-005], Lead Qualification source traceability [WFT-005], and Lead Qualification handoff usability [WFT-005]. The audit found concrete failures: for Lead Qualification rule accuracy [WFT-005], the saved draft left all five written policy rules without adding an unstated tie-breaker without an explicit verification row; for Lead Qualification exception handling [WFT-005], the saved draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the shared-name nonmatch C02/C05 and incomplete record WFT-005-C04. Those were evidence defects in the saved response, not inferred real-world failures, and they became the complete boundary of the single correction pass.",
  "correctionPrompt": "Correct only these detected WFT-005 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Lead Qualification rule accuracy [WFT-005] — the draft left all five written policy rules without adding an unstated tie-breaker without an explicit verification row; 2) Lead Qualification exception handling [WFT-005] — the draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the shared-name nonmatch C02/C05 and incomplete record WFT-005-C04.",
  "finalResult": "Corrected response WFT-005 retained the original fictional inputs, task boundary, and central decision: rank WFT-005-C06 first under P2, keep C02 and C05 separate despite the shared surname, and abstain on WFT-005-C04 until its identifier can be resolved. Concrete corrected artifact row WFT-005-ROW1 reads: “WFT-005-C01 | rank WFT-005-C06 first under P2, keep C02 and C05 separate despite the shared surname, and abstain on WFT-005-C04 until its identifier can be resolved | evidence locator: WFT-005-C01 | static status: 8/10 after one correction.” It changed only the detected failure areas, adding inspectable rows for Lead Qualification rule accuracy [WFT-005]. The frozen final text passed Lead Qualification task fidelity [WFT-005], Lead Qualification rule accuracy [WFT-005], Lead Qualification source traceability [WFT-005], and Lead Qualification handoff usability [WFT-005] and still failed Lead Qualification exception handling [WFT-005]. The final record-by-record decision matrix, ranked queue, and abstention log therefore earned 8/10 from 4 passing checks; no second repair was attempted. This result reports only a bounded transcript-and-fixture evaluation. It does not claim that any workplace process, learner performance, account, device, service, or external system was actually changed, contacted, tested live, or improved.",
  "checks": [
    {
      "name": "Lead Qualification task fidelity [WFT-005]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "WFT-005 static check 1 inspected the saved wording for “Lead Qualification task fidelity [WFT-005].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-005-C04, the declared Lead Qualification rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Lead Qualification rule accuracy [WFT-005]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "WFT-005 static check 2 inspected the saved wording for “Lead Qualification rule accuracy [WFT-005].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-005-C04, the declared Lead Qualification rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Lead Qualification exception handling [WFT-005]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": false,
      "evidence": "WFT-005 static check 3 inspected the saved wording for “Lead Qualification exception handling [WFT-005].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-005-C04, the declared Lead Qualification rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Lead Qualification source traceability [WFT-005]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "WFT-005 static check 4 inspected the saved wording for “Lead Qualification source traceability [WFT-005].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-005-C04, the declared Lead Qualification rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Lead Qualification handoff usability [WFT-005]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "WFT-005 static check 5 inspected the saved wording for “Lead Qualification handoff usability [WFT-005].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-005-C04, the declared Lead Qualification rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    }
  ],
  "initialScore": 6,
  "score": 8,
  "verdict": "worked",
  "recommended": true,
  "whatWorked": [
    "WFT-005 kept “prioritize inbound sales leads using a written qualification policy” bounded to disclosed fictional inputs and preserved an auditable first-response snapshot.",
    "WFT-005 made the central handling—rank WFT-005-C06 first under P2, keep C02 and C05 separate despite the shared surname, and abstain on WFT-005-C04 until its identifier can be resolved—inspectable rather than implying unseen work.",
    "WFT-005 earned final passes for Lead Qualification task fidelity [WFT-005] and Lead Qualification rule accuracy [WFT-005] under the same frozen scoring rules."
  ],
  "whatFailed": [
    "WFT-005 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Lead Qualification exception handling [WFT-005]; the record leaves that final failure visible."
  ],
  "evidencePlan": "A ranked queue and a criterion-by-criterion audit will verify every prioritization decision.",
  "evidenceNotes": [
    "WFT-005 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.",
    "WFT-005 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 4 final-pass checks × 2 = 8/10.",
    "WFT-005 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A ranked queue and a criterion-by-criterion audit will verify every prioritization decision.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome."
  ],
  "limitations": [
    "WFT-005 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Lead Qualification fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.",
    "WFT-005 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results."
  ]
}