{
  "category": "work",
  "slug": "work-design-quality-sampling",
  "title": "A Quality Inspection Sample Built by AI from Defect History: The One-Pass Revision Reached 8/10",
  "task": "design a quality inspection sample from defect history",
  "excerpt": "The completed WFT-045 synthetic field test reached 8/10 after one failure-only correction: 4 of five static checks passed for Quality Sampling, while 1 check remained unresolved.",
  "tool": "Codex multi-agent session",
  "model": "Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session",
  "publishedAt": "2026-07-17T08:00:00+08:00",
  "durationMinutes": 0,
  "testMode": "Synthetic benchmark",
  "inputDisclosure": "Synthetic blind-test input pack WFT-045: A quality team will provide production volumes, defect categories, risk tiers, and inspection-capacity limits. Source facts: six fictional records WFT-045-C01 through WFT-045-C06; policy rules P1–P5; scores 35, 43, 45, 62, 74, and 91; a shared surname on C02/C05; and an incomplete identifier on WFT-045-C04. Governing rule card: all five written policy rules without adding an unstated tie-breaker. Apply the written rules in order; use descending disclosed scores only where ranking is requested; a shared name alone never proves identity; incomplete identifiers require abstention rather than invention. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.",
  "runDisclosure": "We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark WFT-045 for “design a quality inspection sample from defect history” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.",
  "prompt": "Run bounded synthetic field test WFT-045. Task: design a quality inspection sample from defect history. Context: A quality team will provide production volumes, defect categories, risk tiers, and inspection-capacity limits. Fictional source facts: six fictional records WFT-045-C01 through WFT-045-C06; policy rules P1–P5; scores 35, 43, 45, 62, 74, and 91; a shared surname on C02/C05; and an incomplete identifier on WFT-045-C04. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: all five written policy rules without adding an unstated tie-breaker. Apply the written rules in order; use descending disclosed scores only where ranking is requested; a shared name alone never proves identity; incomplete identifiers require abstention rather than invention. Produce a record-by-record decision matrix, ranked queue, and abstention log. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A sampling plan and a coverage calculation will verify allocation across products, risks, and defect types.",
  "firstResult": "Frozen first response WFT-045 produced a record-by-record decision matrix, ranked queue, and abstention log for the task “design a quality inspection sample from defect history.” It treated the supplied pack as fictional and proposed this central handling: rank WFT-045-C06 first under P2, keep C02 and C05 separate despite the shared surname, and abstain on WFT-045-C04 until its identifier can be resolved. Concrete saved artifact row WFT-045-ROW1 reads: “WFT-045-C01 | rank WFT-045-C06 first under P2, keep C02 and C05 separate despite the shared surname, and abstain on WFT-045-C04 until its identifier can be resolved | source: supplied fictional pack | review state: first-draft.” The draft preserved the named records and separated supplied facts from assumptions; its inspectable work product also stated that no message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome had occurred. On the five predeclared static checks, it passed Quality Sampling task fidelity [WFT-045], Quality Sampling source traceability [WFT-045], and Quality Sampling handoff usability [WFT-045]. The audit found concrete failures: for Quality Sampling rule accuracy [WFT-045], the saved draft left all five written policy rules without adding an unstated tie-breaker without an explicit verification row; for Quality Sampling exception handling [WFT-045], the saved draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the shared-name nonmatch C02/C05 and incomplete record WFT-045-C04. Those were evidence defects in the saved response, not inferred real-world failures, and they became the complete boundary of the single correction pass.",
  "correctionPrompt": "Correct only these detected WFT-045 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Quality Sampling rule accuracy [WFT-045] — the draft left all five written policy rules without adding an unstated tie-breaker without an explicit verification row; 2) Quality Sampling exception handling [WFT-045] — the draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the shared-name nonmatch C02/C05 and incomplete record WFT-045-C04.",
  "finalResult": "Corrected response WFT-045 retained the original fictional inputs, task boundary, and central decision: rank WFT-045-C06 first under P2, keep C02 and C05 separate despite the shared surname, and abstain on WFT-045-C04 until its identifier can be resolved. Concrete corrected artifact row WFT-045-ROW1 reads: “WFT-045-C01 | rank WFT-045-C06 first under P2, keep C02 and C05 separate despite the shared surname, and abstain on WFT-045-C04 until its identifier can be resolved | evidence locator: WFT-045-C01 | static status: 8/10 after one correction.” It changed only the detected failure areas, adding inspectable rows for Quality Sampling rule accuracy [WFT-045]. The frozen final text passed Quality Sampling task fidelity [WFT-045], Quality Sampling rule accuracy [WFT-045], Quality Sampling source traceability [WFT-045], and Quality Sampling handoff usability [WFT-045] and still failed Quality Sampling exception handling [WFT-045]. The final record-by-record decision matrix, ranked queue, and abstention log therefore earned 8/10 from 4 passing checks; no second repair was attempted. This result reports only a bounded transcript-and-fixture evaluation. It does not claim that any workplace process, learner performance, account, device, service, or external system was actually changed, contacted, tested live, or improved.",
  "checks": [
    {
      "name": "Quality Sampling task fidelity [WFT-045]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "WFT-045 static check 1 inspected the saved wording for “Quality Sampling task fidelity [WFT-045].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-045-C04, the declared Quality Sampling rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Quality Sampling rule accuracy [WFT-045]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "WFT-045 static check 2 inspected the saved wording for “Quality Sampling rule accuracy [WFT-045].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-045-C04, the declared Quality Sampling rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Quality Sampling exception handling [WFT-045]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": false,
      "evidence": "WFT-045 static check 3 inspected the saved wording for “Quality Sampling exception handling [WFT-045].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-045-C04, the declared Quality Sampling rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Quality Sampling source traceability [WFT-045]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "WFT-045 static check 4 inspected the saved wording for “Quality Sampling source traceability [WFT-045].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-045-C04, the declared Quality Sampling rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Quality Sampling handoff usability [WFT-045]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "WFT-045 static check 5 inspected the saved wording for “Quality Sampling handoff usability [WFT-045].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture WFT-045-C04, the declared Quality Sampling rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    }
  ],
  "initialScore": 6,
  "score": 8,
  "verdict": "worked",
  "recommended": true,
  "whatWorked": [
    "WFT-045 kept “design a quality inspection sample from defect history” bounded to disclosed fictional inputs and preserved an auditable first-response snapshot.",
    "WFT-045 made the central handling—rank WFT-045-C06 first under P2, keep C02 and C05 separate despite the shared surname, and abstain on WFT-045-C04 until its identifier can be resolved—inspectable rather than implying unseen work.",
    "WFT-045 earned final passes for Quality Sampling task fidelity [WFT-045] and Quality Sampling rule accuracy [WFT-045] under the same frozen scoring rules."
  ],
  "whatFailed": [
    "WFT-045 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Quality Sampling exception handling [WFT-045]; the record leaves that final failure visible."
  ],
  "evidencePlan": "A sampling plan and a coverage calculation will verify allocation across products, risks, and defect types.",
  "evidenceNotes": [
    "WFT-045 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.",
    "WFT-045 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 4 final-pass checks × 2 = 8/10.",
    "WFT-045 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A sampling plan and a coverage calculation will verify allocation across products, risks, and defect types.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome."
  ],
  "limitations": [
    "WFT-045 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Quality Sampling fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.",
    "WFT-045 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results."
  ]
}