{
  "category": "learning",
  "slug": "learning-workplace-safety-scenarios",
  "title": "Using Branching Scenarios for AI-Guided Workplace-Safety Training — Three of Five Checks Passed",
  "task": "teach workplace safety through branching scenarios",
  "excerpt": "The completed LFT-042 synthetic field test stopped at 6/10: three of five Safety training checks passed after one correction, but Safety training learner adaptation [LFT-042] and Safety training evidence traceability [LFT-042] remained unsupported.",
  "tool": "Codex multi-agent session",
  "model": "Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session",
  "publishedAt": "2026-08-02T15:00:00+08:00",
  "durationMinutes": 0,
  "testMode": "Synthetic benchmark",
  "inputDisclosure": "Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-042: Adult trainees will choose responses to fictional warehouse hazards and receive explanations tied to a supplied policy. Source facts: scenario LFT-042-S01 chemical spill; choices isolate/report/clean alone/ignore; PPE chart P2; emergency 555-0142; stop condition exposure symptoms. Governing rule card: safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk. Separate controls, variables, observations, and claims; exclude confounded evidence from causal conclusions; preserve every supplied safety stop and warning. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.",
  "runDisclosure": "We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-042 for “teach workplace safety through branching scenarios” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 3 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.",
  "prompt": "Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-042. Task: teach workplace safety through branching scenarios. Context: Adult trainees will choose responses to fictional warehouse hazards and receive explanations tied to a supplied policy. Fictional source facts: scenario LFT-042-S01 chemical spill; choices isolate/report/clean alone/ignore; PPE chart P2; emergency 555-0142; stop condition exposure symptoms. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk. Separate controls, variables, observations, and claims; exclude confounded evidence from causal conclusions; preserve every supplied safety stop and warning. Produce a branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: Every scenario branch will be mapped to the policy text and reviewed by a safety instructor.",
  "firstResult": "Frozen first response LFT-042 produced a branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key for “teach workplace safety through branching scenarios.” Its first artifact row read “LFT-042-S01 | branch isolate-and-report to safety, mark solo cleanup unsafe, require PPE lookup, and route symptoms to escalation | status: proposed | source: fictional fixture.” A second row named tempting solo cleanup and mandatory stop condition and left the disposition blank. The rule cell mentioned without verifying safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk. No message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome occurred. The audit passed Safety training objective fit [LFT-042] and Safety training safety and access [LFT-042]. It found for Safety training content accuracy [LFT-042], the draft mentioned but did not verify safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk; for Safety training learner adaptation [LFT-042], the draft left tempting solo cleanup and mandatory stop condition without an explicit disposition; for Safety training evidence traceability [LFT-042], the draft gave LFT-042-S01 no source locator. Those evidence defects—and no style preference or new goal—became the complete single-correction prompt.",
  "correctionPrompt": "Correct only these detected LFT-042 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Safety training content accuracy [LFT-042] — the draft mentioned but did not verify safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk; 2) Safety training learner adaptation [LFT-042] — the draft left tempting solo cleanup and mandatory stop condition without an explicit disposition; 3) Safety training evidence traceability [LFT-042] — the draft gave LFT-042-S01 no source locator.",
  "finalResult": "Corrected response LFT-042 preserved all supplied identifiers and the central decision: branch isolate-and-report to safety, mark solo cleanup unsafe, require PPE lookup, and route symptoms to escalation. Its corrected row read “LFT-042-S01 | rule: safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk | decision: branch isolate-and-report to safety, mark solo cleanup unsafe, require PPE lookup, and route symptoms to escalation | static status: 6/10.” It changed only failed dimensions, adding support for Safety training content accuracy [LFT-042]. The final audit passed Safety training objective fit [LFT-042], Safety training content accuracy [LFT-042], and Safety training safety and access [LFT-042]. It still lacked Safety training learner adaptation [LFT-042] and Safety training evidence traceability [LFT-042]; those failures remain visible. The branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key earned 6/10 from 3 checks; no second repair was attempted. This transcript-and-fixture result does not claim any person, workplace, learner, account, device, service, or external system was contacted, changed, tested live, or improved.",
  "checks": [
    {
      "name": "Safety training objective fit [LFT-042]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-042 static check 1 inspected “Safety training objective fit [LFT-042]” against LFT-042-S01, the rule “safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk,” and the saved branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome."
    },
    {
      "name": "Safety training content accuracy [LFT-042]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-042 static check 2 inspected “Safety training content accuracy [LFT-042]” against LFT-042-S01, the rule “safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk,” and the saved branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome."
    },
    {
      "name": "Safety training learner adaptation [LFT-042]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": false,
      "evidence": "LFT-042 static check 3 inspected “Safety training learner adaptation [LFT-042]” against LFT-042-S01, the rule “safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk,” and the saved branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript failed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome."
    },
    {
      "name": "Safety training evidence traceability [LFT-042]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": false,
      "evidence": "LFT-042 static check 4 inspected “Safety training evidence traceability [LFT-042]” against LFT-042-S01, the rule “safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk,” and the saved branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript failed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome."
    },
    {
      "name": "Safety training safety and access [LFT-042]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-042 static check 5 inspected “Safety training safety and access [LFT-042]” against LFT-042-S01, the rule “safety instructions match supplied procedure and never reward risk,” and the saved branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome."
    }
  ],
  "initialScore": 4,
  "score": 6,
  "verdict": "mixed",
  "recommended": false,
  "whatWorked": [
    "LFT-042 bounded “teach workplace safety through branching scenarios” to disclosed fictional inputs and froze the first response.",
    "LFT-042 exposed LFT-042-S01—branch isolate-and-report to safety, mark solo cleanup unsafe, require PPE lookup, and route symptoms to escalation—inside the saved branching safety scenario, decision quiz, and rationale key.",
    "LFT-042 earned inspectable passes for Safety training objective fit [LFT-042] and Safety training content accuracy [LFT-042] under the unchanged rubric."
  ],
  "whatFailed": [
    "LFT-042 still lacked saved-text evidence for Safety training learner adaptation [LFT-042]; that failure remains published.",
    "LFT-042 still lacked saved-text evidence for Safety training evidence traceability [LFT-042]; that failure remains published."
  ],
  "evidencePlan": "Every scenario branch will be mapped to the policy text and reviewed by a safety instructor.",
  "evidenceNotes": [
    "LFT-042 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.",
    "LFT-042 scores are arithmetic: 2 first-pass checks × 2 = 4/10; 3 final-pass checks × 2 = 6/10.",
    "LFT-042 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—Every scenario branch will be mapped to the policy text and reviewed by a safety instructor.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome."
  ],
  "limitations": [
    "LFT-042 is a synthetic benchmark, so its mixed verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Safety training fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.",
    "LFT-042 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results."
  ]
}