{
  "category": "learning",
  "slug": "learning-study-calendar-recovery",
  "title": "Rebuilding a Study Plan After Missed Deadlines with AI — Three of Five Checks Passed",
  "task": "rebuild a study plan after missed deadlines",
  "excerpt": "The completed LFT-006 synthetic field test stopped at 6/10: three of five Study planning checks passed after one correction, but Study planning objective fit [LFT-006] and Study planning content accuracy [LFT-006] remained unsupported.",
  "tool": "Codex multi-agent session",
  "model": "Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-11T16:00:00+08:00",
  "durationMinutes": 0,
  "testMode": "Synthetic benchmark",
  "inputDisclosure": "Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-006: The AI will revise a university study calendar after several assignments and revision sessions are missed. Source facts: fictional calendar LFT-006-C1 covering 14 days; exam dates on days 9 and 14; available blocks of 25, 40, and 55 minutes; missed tasks M2/M4; prerequisite P1 before P3; and a maximum of 4 study blocks per day. Governing rule card: the 4-block daily ceiling and both fixed exam dates. Honor fixed dates, available block lengths, prerequisite order, spacing intervals, workload ceilings, recovery space, and any learner-controlled stop condition. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.",
  "runDisclosure": "We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-006 for “rebuild a study plan after missed deadlines” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 3 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.",
  "prompt": "Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-006. Task: rebuild a study plan after missed deadlines. Context: The AI will revise a university study calendar after several assignments and revision sessions are missed. Fictional source facts: fictional calendar LFT-006-C1 covering 14 days; exam dates on days 9 and 14; available blocks of 25, 40, and 55 minutes; missed tasks M2/M4; prerequisite P1 before P3; and a maximum of 4 study blocks per day. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: the 4-block daily ceiling and both fixed exam dates. Honor fixed dates, available block lengths, prerequisite order, spacing intervals, workload ceilings, recovery space, and any learner-controlled stop condition. Produce a dated learning plan, constraint map, and recovery checkpoint. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: Calendar snapshots and constraint checks will verify that the revised plan remains feasible and complete.",
  "firstResult": "Frozen first response LFT-006 produced a dated learning plan, constraint map, and recovery checkpoint for the task “rebuild a study plan after missed deadlines.” It treated the supplied pack as fictional and proposed this central handling: move M2 to day 3, keep P1 before P3, protect the day-9 review, and leave one recovery block open rather than exceeding 4 daily sessions. Concrete saved artifact row LFT-006-ROW1 reads: “LFT-006-C1 | move M2 to day 3, keep P1 before P3, protect the day-9 review, and leave one recovery block open rather than exceeding 4 daily sessions | source: supplied fictional pack | review state: first-draft.” The draft preserved the named records and separated supplied facts from assumptions; its inspectable learning intervention also stated that no message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome had occurred. On the five predeclared static checks, it passed Study planning learner adaptation [LFT-006] and Study planning evidence traceability [LFT-006]. The audit found concrete failures: for Study planning objective fit [LFT-006], the saved draft did not connect LFT-006-M4 to the full boundary of “rebuild a study plan after missed deadlines”; for Study planning content accuracy [LFT-006], the saved draft left the 4-block daily ceiling and both fixed exam dates without an explicit verification row; for Study planning safety and access [LFT-006], the saved draft left the dated learning plan, constraint map, and recovery checkpoint without a complete reviewer handoff and acceptance marker. Those were evidence defects in the saved response, not inferred real-world failures, and they became the complete boundary of the single correction pass.",
  "correctionPrompt": "Correct only these detected LFT-006 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Study planning objective fit [LFT-006] — the draft did not connect LFT-006-M4 to the full boundary of “rebuild a study plan after missed deadlines”; 2) Study planning content accuracy [LFT-006] — the draft left the 4-block daily ceiling and both fixed exam dates without an explicit verification row; 3) Study planning safety and access [LFT-006] — the draft left the dated learning plan, constraint map, and recovery checkpoint without a complete reviewer handoff and acceptance marker.",
  "finalResult": "Corrected response LFT-006 retained the original fictional inputs, task boundary, and central decision: move M2 to day 3, keep P1 before P3, protect the day-9 review, and leave one recovery block open rather than exceeding 4 daily sessions. Concrete corrected artifact row LFT-006-ROW1 reads: “LFT-006-C1 | move M2 to day 3, keep P1 before P3, protect the day-9 review, and leave one recovery block open rather than exceeding 4 daily sessions | evidence locator: LFT-006-C1 | static status: 6/10 after one correction.” It changed only the detected failure areas, adding inspectable rows for Study planning safety and access [LFT-006]. The frozen final text passed Study planning learner adaptation [LFT-006], Study planning evidence traceability [LFT-006], and Study planning safety and access [LFT-006] and still failed Study planning objective fit [LFT-006] and Study planning content accuracy [LFT-006]. The final dated learning plan, constraint map, and recovery checkpoint therefore earned 6/10 from 3 passing checks; no second repair was attempted. This result reports only a bounded transcript-and-fixture evaluation. It does not claim that any workplace process, learner performance, account, device, service, or external system was actually changed, contacted, tested live, or improved.",
  "checks": [
    {
      "name": "Study planning objective fit [LFT-006]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": false,
      "evidence": "LFT-006 static check 1 inspected the saved wording for “Study planning objective fit [LFT-006].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-006-M4, the declared Study planning rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Study planning content accuracy [LFT-006]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": false,
      "evidence": "LFT-006 static check 2 inspected the saved wording for “Study planning content accuracy [LFT-006].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-006-M4, the declared Study planning rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Study planning learner adaptation [LFT-006]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-006 static check 3 inspected the saved wording for “Study planning learner adaptation [LFT-006].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-006-M4, the declared Study planning rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Study planning evidence traceability [LFT-006]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-006 static check 4 inspected the saved wording for “Study planning evidence traceability [LFT-006].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-006-M4, the declared Study planning rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Study planning safety and access [LFT-006]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-006 static check 5 inspected the saved wording for “Study planning safety and access [LFT-006].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-006-M4, the declared Study planning rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    }
  ],
  "initialScore": 4,
  "score": 6,
  "verdict": "mixed",
  "recommended": false,
  "whatWorked": [
    "LFT-006 kept “rebuild a study plan after missed deadlines” bounded to disclosed fictional inputs and preserved an auditable first-response snapshot.",
    "LFT-006 made the central handling—move M2 to day 3, keep P1 before P3, protect the day-9 review, and leave one recovery block open rather than exceeding 4 daily sessions—inspectable rather than implying unseen work.",
    "LFT-006 earned final passes for Study planning learner adaptation [LFT-006] and Study planning evidence traceability [LFT-006] under the same frozen scoring rules."
  ],
  "whatFailed": [
    "LFT-006 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Study planning objective fit [LFT-006]; the record leaves that final failure visible.",
    "LFT-006 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Study planning content accuracy [LFT-006]; the record leaves that final failure visible."
  ],
  "evidencePlan": "Calendar snapshots and constraint checks will verify that the revised plan remains feasible and complete.",
  "evidenceNotes": [
    "LFT-006 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.",
    "LFT-006 scores are arithmetic: 2 first-pass checks × 2 = 4/10; 3 final-pass checks × 2 = 6/10.",
    "LFT-006 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—Calendar snapshots and constraint checks will verify that the revised plan remains feasible and complete.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome."
  ],
  "limitations": [
    "LFT-006 is a synthetic benchmark, so its mixed verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Study planning fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.",
    "LFT-006 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results."
  ]
}