{
  "category": "learning",
  "slug": "learning-review-citation-paraphrases",
  "title": "Are These Paraphrases Too Close to Their Sources: The One-Pass Revision Reached 8/10",
  "task": "check whether paraphrases remain independent from source wording",
  "excerpt": "The completed LFT-069 synthetic field test reached 8/10 after one failure-only correction: 4 of five static checks passed for Paraphrase Review, while 1 check remained unresolved.",
  "tool": "Codex multi-agent session",
  "model": "Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session",
  "publishedAt": "2026-07-27T17:00:00+08:00",
  "durationMinutes": 0,
  "testMode": "Synthetic benchmark",
  "inputDisclosure": "Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-069: A writing center will provide bounded source excerpts, student paraphrases, citations, and borderline examples approved for training use. Source facts: fictional excerpts LFT-069-T01 through LFT-069-T04 dated 1912, 1936, 1974, and 2008; claim C1 supported by T01/T03; claim C2 contradicted by T02; an unknown author motive; and quotation locator LFT-069-T03-L7. Governing rule card: claim-level citation and separation of evidence from interpretation. Tie each claim or interpretation to a supplied excerpt, observation, pitch, or locator; expose contradictions; do not infer an author, artist, or source motive that is absent. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.",
  "runDisclosure": "We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-069 for “check whether paraphrases remain independent from source wording” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.",
  "prompt": "Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-069. Task: check whether paraphrases remain independent from source wording. Context: A writing center will provide bounded source excerpts, student paraphrases, citations, and borderline examples approved for training use. Fictional source facts: fictional excerpts LFT-069-T01 through LFT-069-T04 dated 1912, 1936, 1974, and 2008; claim C1 supported by T01/T03; claim C2 contradicted by T02; an unknown author motive; and quotation locator LFT-069-T03-L7. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: claim-level citation and separation of evidence from interpretation. Tie each claim or interpretation to a supplied excerpt, observation, pitch, or locator; expose contradictions; do not infer an author, artist, or source motive that is absent. Produce a claim-source matrix, guided questions, and uncertainty annotations. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: Phrase-overlap measures and two human raters will verify source fidelity, excessive borrowing, citation presence, and false accusations.",
  "firstResult": "Frozen first response LFT-069 produced a claim-source matrix, guided questions, and uncertainty annotations for the task “check whether paraphrases remain independent from source wording.” It treated the supplied pack as fictional and proposed this central handling: support C1 with T01/T03, flag C2's conflict with T02, and refuse to infer the unknown motive while directing attention to LFT-069-T03-L7. Concrete saved artifact row LFT-069-ROW1 reads: “LFT-069-T01 | support C1 with T01/T03, flag C2's conflict with T02, and refuse to infer the unknown motive while directing attention to LFT-069-T03-L7 | source: supplied fictional pack | review state: first-draft.” The draft preserved the named records and separated supplied facts from assumptions; its inspectable learning intervention also stated that no message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome had occurred. On the five predeclared static checks, it passed Paraphrase Review objective fit [LFT-069], Paraphrase Review evidence traceability [LFT-069], and Paraphrase Review safety and access [LFT-069]. The audit found concrete failures: for Paraphrase Review content accuracy [LFT-069], the saved draft left claim-level citation and separation of evidence from interpretation without an explicit verification row; for Paraphrase Review learner adaptation [LFT-069], the saved draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the contradictory LFT-069-T02 account and undocumented author motive. Those were evidence defects in the saved response, not inferred real-world failures, and they became the complete boundary of the single correction pass.",
  "correctionPrompt": "Correct only these detected LFT-069 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Paraphrase Review content accuracy [LFT-069] — the draft left claim-level citation and separation of evidence from interpretation without an explicit verification row; 2) Paraphrase Review learner adaptation [LFT-069] — the draft did not resolve or clearly preserve the contradictory LFT-069-T02 account and undocumented author motive.",
  "finalResult": "Corrected response LFT-069 retained the original fictional inputs, task boundary, and central decision: support C1 with T01/T03, flag C2's conflict with T02, and refuse to infer the unknown motive while directing attention to LFT-069-T03-L7. Concrete corrected artifact row LFT-069-ROW1 reads: “LFT-069-T01 | support C1 with T01/T03, flag C2's conflict with T02, and refuse to infer the unknown motive while directing attention to LFT-069-T03-L7 | evidence locator: LFT-069-T01 | static status: 8/10 after one correction.” It changed only the detected failure areas, adding inspectable rows for Paraphrase Review content accuracy [LFT-069]. The frozen final text passed Paraphrase Review objective fit [LFT-069], Paraphrase Review content accuracy [LFT-069], Paraphrase Review evidence traceability [LFT-069], and Paraphrase Review safety and access [LFT-069] and still failed Paraphrase Review learner adaptation [LFT-069]. The final claim-source matrix, guided questions, and uncertainty annotations therefore earned 8/10 from 4 passing checks; no second repair was attempted. This result reports only a bounded transcript-and-fixture evaluation. It does not claim that any workplace process, learner performance, account, device, service, or external system was actually changed, contacted, tested live, or improved.",
  "checks": [
    {
      "name": "Paraphrase Review objective fit [LFT-069]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-069 static check 1 inspected the saved wording for “Paraphrase Review objective fit [LFT-069].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-069-T02, the declared Paraphrase Review rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Paraphrase Review content accuracy [LFT-069]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-069 static check 2 inspected the saved wording for “Paraphrase Review content accuracy [LFT-069].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-069-T02, the declared Paraphrase Review rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Paraphrase Review learner adaptation [LFT-069]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": false,
      "evidence": "LFT-069 static check 3 inspected the saved wording for “Paraphrase Review learner adaptation [LFT-069].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript did not contain enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-069-T02, the declared Paraphrase Review rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Paraphrase Review evidence traceability [LFT-069]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-069 static check 4 inspected the saved wording for “Paraphrase Review evidence traceability [LFT-069].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-069-T02, the declared Paraphrase Review rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Paraphrase Review safety and access [LFT-069]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-069 static check 5 inspected the saved wording for “Paraphrase Review safety and access [LFT-069].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-069-T02, the declared Paraphrase Review rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    }
  ],
  "initialScore": 6,
  "score": 8,
  "verdict": "worked",
  "recommended": true,
  "whatWorked": [
    "LFT-069 kept “check whether paraphrases remain independent from source wording” bounded to disclosed fictional inputs and preserved an auditable first-response snapshot.",
    "LFT-069 made the central handling—support C1 with T01/T03, flag C2's conflict with T02, and refuse to infer the unknown motive while directing attention to LFT-069-T03-L7—inspectable rather than implying unseen work.",
    "LFT-069 earned final passes for Paraphrase Review objective fit [LFT-069] and Paraphrase Review content accuracy [LFT-069] under the same frozen scoring rules."
  ],
  "whatFailed": [
    "LFT-069 still lacked enough saved-text evidence for Paraphrase Review learner adaptation [LFT-069]; the record leaves that final failure visible."
  ],
  "evidencePlan": "Phrase-overlap measures and two human raters will verify source fidelity, excessive borrowing, citation presence, and false accusations.",
  "evidenceNotes": [
    "LFT-069 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.",
    "LFT-069 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 4 final-pass checks × 2 = 8/10.",
    "LFT-069 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—Phrase-overlap measures and two human raters will verify source fidelity, excessive borrowing, citation presence, and false accusations.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome."
  ],
  "limitations": [
    "LFT-069 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Paraphrase Review fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.",
    "LFT-069 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results."
  ]
}