{
  "category": "learning",
  "slug": "learning-note-synthesis",
  "title": "Combining Conflicting Class Notes into an AI-Assisted Study Guide — Completed Benchmark Result: 8/10",
  "task": "help combine conflicting class notes into a study guide",
  "excerpt": "The completed LFT-022 synthetic field test reached 8/10 after one failure-only correction: 4 of five static checks passed for Note synthesis, while 1 check remained unresolved.",
  "tool": "Codex multi-agent session",
  "model": "Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-14T18:00:00+08:00",
  "durationMinutes": 0,
  "testMode": "Synthetic benchmark",
  "inputDisclosure": "Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-022: The AI will organize two students' partially conflicting lecture notes while marking unresolved discrepancies. Source facts: notes LFT-022-N01–N03 on photosynthesis; N01 says light reactions in stroma, N02/N03 say thylakoid; dates missing; approved slide S4. Governing rule card: every synthesized statement retains a supporting note or declared conflict. Honor fixed dates, available block lengths, prerequisite order, spacing intervals, workload ceilings, recovery space, and any learner-controlled stop condition. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.",
  "runDisclosure": "We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-022 for “help combine conflicting class notes into a study guide” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.",
  "prompt": "Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-022. Task: help combine conflicting class notes into a study guide. Context: The AI will organize two students' partially conflicting lecture notes while marking unresolved discrepancies. Fictional source facts: notes LFT-022-N01–N03 on photosynthesis; N01 says light reactions in stroma, N02/N03 say thylakoid; dates missing; approved slide S4. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: every synthesized statement retains a supporting note or declared conflict. Honor fixed dates, available block lengths, prerequisite order, spacing intervals, workload ceilings, recovery space, and any learner-controlled stop condition. Produce a study-guide outline, conflict table, and source-linked statements. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A provenance table will trace every guide statement to the notes and preserve each unresolved conflict.",
  "firstResult": "Frozen first response LFT-022 produced a study-guide outline, conflict table, and source-linked statements for “help combine conflicting class notes into a study guide.” Its first artifact row read “LFT-022-N01 | follow N02/N03 and S4 for thylakoid, expose N01’s conflict, and mark missing dates | status: proposed | source: fictional fixture.” A second row named the N01 location conflict and missing lecture date and left the disposition blank. The rule cell verified every synthesized statement retains a supporting note or declared conflict. No message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome occurred. The audit passed Note synthesis objective fit [LFT-022], Note synthesis content accuracy [LFT-022], and Note synthesis safety and access [LFT-022]. It found for Note synthesis learner adaptation [LFT-022], the draft left the N01 location conflict and missing lecture date without an explicit disposition; for Note synthesis evidence traceability [LFT-022], the draft gave LFT-022-N01 no source locator. Those evidence defects—and no style preference or new goal—became the complete single-correction prompt.",
  "correctionPrompt": "Correct only these detected LFT-022 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Note synthesis learner adaptation [LFT-022] — the draft left the N01 location conflict and missing lecture date without an explicit disposition; 2) Note synthesis evidence traceability [LFT-022] — the draft gave LFT-022-N01 no source locator.",
  "finalResult": "Corrected response LFT-022 preserved all supplied identifiers and the central decision: follow N02/N03 and S4 for thylakoid, expose N01’s conflict, and mark missing dates. Its corrected row read “LFT-022-N01 | rule: every synthesized statement retains a supporting note or declared conflict | decision: follow N02/N03 and S4 for thylakoid, expose N01’s conflict, and mark missing dates | static status: 8/10.” It changed only failed dimensions, adding support for Note synthesis learner adaptation [LFT-022]. The final audit passed Note synthesis objective fit [LFT-022], Note synthesis content accuracy [LFT-022], Note synthesis learner adaptation [LFT-022], and Note synthesis safety and access [LFT-022]. It still lacked Note synthesis evidence traceability [LFT-022]; those failures remain visible. The study-guide outline, conflict table, and source-linked statements earned 8/10 from 4 checks; no second repair was attempted. This transcript-and-fixture result does not claim any person, workplace, learner, account, device, service, or external system was contacted, changed, tested live, or improved.",
  "checks": [
    {
      "name": "Note synthesis objective fit [LFT-022]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-022 static check 1 inspected “Note synthesis objective fit [LFT-022]” against LFT-022-N01, the rule “every synthesized statement retains a supporting note or declared conflict,” and the saved study-guide outline, conflict table, and source-linked statements. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome."
    },
    {
      "name": "Note synthesis content accuracy [LFT-022]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-022 static check 2 inspected “Note synthesis content accuracy [LFT-022]” against LFT-022-N01, the rule “every synthesized statement retains a supporting note or declared conflict,” and the saved study-guide outline, conflict table, and source-linked statements. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome."
    },
    {
      "name": "Note synthesis learner adaptation [LFT-022]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-022 static check 3 inspected “Note synthesis learner adaptation [LFT-022]” against LFT-022-N01, the rule “every synthesized statement retains a supporting note or declared conflict,” and the saved study-guide outline, conflict table, and source-linked statements. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome."
    },
    {
      "name": "Note synthesis evidence traceability [LFT-022]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": false,
      "evidence": "LFT-022 static check 4 inspected “Note synthesis evidence traceability [LFT-022]” against LFT-022-N01, the rule “every synthesized statement retains a supporting note or declared conflict,” and the saved study-guide outline, conflict table, and source-linked statements. The first transcript failed; the corrected transcript failed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome."
    },
    {
      "name": "Note synthesis safety and access [LFT-022]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-022 static check 5 inspected “Note synthesis safety and access [LFT-022]” against LFT-022-N01, the rule “every synthesized statement retains a supporting note or declared conflict,” and the saved study-guide outline, conflict table, and source-linked statements. The first transcript passed; the corrected transcript passed. Only fictional text counted, never a live outcome."
    }
  ],
  "initialScore": 6,
  "score": 8,
  "verdict": "worked",
  "recommended": true,
  "whatWorked": [
    "LFT-022 bounded “help combine conflicting class notes into a study guide” to disclosed fictional inputs and froze the first response.",
    "LFT-022 exposed LFT-022-N01—follow N02/N03 and S4 for thylakoid, expose N01’s conflict, and mark missing dates—inside the saved study-guide outline, conflict table, and source-linked statements.",
    "LFT-022 earned inspectable passes for Note synthesis objective fit [LFT-022] and Note synthesis content accuracy [LFT-022] under the unchanged rubric."
  ],
  "whatFailed": [
    "LFT-022 still lacked saved-text evidence for Note synthesis evidence traceability [LFT-022]; that failure remains published."
  ],
  "evidencePlan": "A provenance table will trace every guide statement to the notes and preserve each unresolved conflict.",
  "evidenceNotes": [
    "LFT-022 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.",
    "LFT-022 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 4 final-pass checks × 2 = 8/10.",
    "LFT-022 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A provenance table will trace every guide statement to the notes and preserve each unresolved conflict.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome."
  ],
  "limitations": [
    "LFT-022 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Note synthesis fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.",
    "LFT-022 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results."
  ]
}