{
  "category": "learning",
  "slug": "learning-ecosystem-lesson-plan",
  "title": "Planning an Ecosystem Inquiry Lesson with AI: Four or More Checks Passed After One Correction",
  "task": "plan an inquiry lesson about ecosystems",
  "excerpt": "The completed LFT-003 synthetic field test reached 10/10 after one failure-only correction: 5 of five static checks passed for Lesson planning, while 0 checks remained unresolved.",
  "tool": "Codex multi-agent session",
  "model": "Exact underlying model identifier not disclosed by the Codex session",
  "publishedAt": "2026-07-03T17:00:00+08:00",
  "durationMinutes": 0,
  "testMode": "Synthetic benchmark",
  "inputDisclosure": "Synthetic blind-test input pack LFT-003: The AI will draft a middle-school lesson that links a local food web investigation to stated learning objectives. Source facts: fictional observations LFT-003-S01 through LFT-003-S06; temperature readings 18, 21, 32, 22, 19, and 20°C; control C0; variable V1; one confounded sample S04; and mandatory safety note Q2. Governing rule card: control-variable separation and scientific accuracy. Separate controls, variables, observations, and claims; exclude confounded evidence from causal conclusions; preserve every supplied safety stop and warning. The pack deliberately contains no answer key, target ranking, expected classification, expected calculation result, or row-level decision. Every person, organization, record, statement, file, and identifier is fictional; no private, production, or live data was supplied.",
  "runDisclosure": "We ran one text-only synthetic benchmark LFT-003 for “plan an inquiry lesson about ecosystems” in a Codex multi-agent session. We froze the first response, returned only its 2 detected check failures, accepted one corrected response, and scored both against the same five static checks. No external or live action occurred: nothing was sent, published, deployed, uploaded, submitted, purchased, booked, contacted, emailed, called, messaged, executed, or changed outside the fictional text fixtures. No external, live, or production action occurred. Per-case elapsed time was not instrumented during the batch session.",
  "prompt": "Run bounded synthetic field test LFT-003. Task: plan an inquiry lesson about ecosystems. Context: The AI will draft a middle-school lesson that links a local food web investigation to stated learning objectives. Fictional source facts: fictional observations LFT-003-S01 through LFT-003-S06; temperature readings 18, 21, 32, 22, 19, and 20°C; control C0; variable V1; one confounded sample S04; and mandatory safety note Q2. Governing policy, formula, or rubric: control-variable separation and scientific accuracy. Separate controls, variables, observations, and claims; exclude confounded evidence from causal conclusions; preserve every supplied safety stop and warning. Produce an inquiry sequence, evidence table, and safety-or-misconception checkpoint. Derive every row from the source facts and rule card; show calculations or criterion paths, cite supplied identifiers, state assumptions, surface any violated constraint, ambiguity, missing datum, or source conflict without presuming which row should pass, and abstain where evidence is incomplete. Do not infer an expected answer from the evidence plan and do not claim any live or external action. Planned verification after the frozen response: A curriculum-alignment checklist will verify objective coverage, activity feasibility, and assessment fit.",
  "firstResult": "Frozen first response LFT-003 produced an inquiry sequence, evidence table, and safety-or-misconception checkpoint for the task “plan an inquiry lesson about ecosystems.” It treated the supplied pack as fictional and proposed this central handling: compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-003-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion. Concrete saved artifact row LFT-003-ROW1 reads: “LFT-003-S01 | compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-003-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion | source: supplied fictional pack | review state: first-draft.” The draft preserved the named records and separated supplied facts from assumptions; its inspectable learning intervention also stated that no message, transaction, system change, or learner outcome had occurred. On the five predeclared static checks, it passed Lesson planning content accuracy [LFT-003], Lesson planning learner adaptation [LFT-003], and Lesson planning evidence traceability [LFT-003]. The audit found concrete failures: for Lesson planning objective fit [LFT-003], the saved draft did not connect LFT-003-S04 to the full boundary of “plan an inquiry lesson about ecosystems”; for Lesson planning safety and access [LFT-003], the saved draft left the inquiry sequence, evidence table, and safety-or-misconception checkpoint without a complete reviewer handoff and acceptance marker. Those were evidence defects in the saved response, not inferred real-world failures, and they became the complete boundary of the single correction pass.",
  "correctionPrompt": "Correct only these detected LFT-003 first-draft failures, using no new input or goal: 1) Lesson planning objective fit [LFT-003] — the draft did not connect LFT-003-S04 to the full boundary of “plan an inquiry lesson about ecosystems”; 2) Lesson planning safety and access [LFT-003] — the draft left the inquiry sequence, evidence table, and safety-or-misconception checkpoint without a complete reviewer handoff and acceptance marker.",
  "finalResult": "Corrected response LFT-003 retained the original fictional inputs, task boundary, and central decision: compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-003-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion. Concrete corrected artifact row LFT-003-ROW1 reads: “LFT-003-S01 | compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-003-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion | evidence locator: LFT-003-S01 | static status: 10/10 after one correction.” It changed only the detected failure areas, adding inspectable rows for Lesson planning objective fit [LFT-003] and Lesson planning safety and access [LFT-003]. The frozen final text passed Lesson planning objective fit [LFT-003], Lesson planning content accuracy [LFT-003], Lesson planning learner adaptation [LFT-003], Lesson planning evidence traceability [LFT-003], and Lesson planning safety and access [LFT-003]. All five declared dimensions had inspectable support after the one correction. The final inquiry sequence, evidence table, and safety-or-misconception checkpoint therefore earned 10/10 from 5 passing checks; no second repair was attempted. This result reports only a bounded transcript-and-fixture evaluation. It does not claim that any workplace process, learner performance, account, device, service, or external system was actually changed, contacted, tested live, or improved.",
  "checks": [
    {
      "name": "Lesson planning objective fit [LFT-003]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-003 static check 1 inspected the saved wording for “Lesson planning objective fit [LFT-003].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-003-S04, the declared Lesson planning rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Lesson planning content accuracy [LFT-003]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-003 static check 2 inspected the saved wording for “Lesson planning content accuracy [LFT-003].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-003-S04, the declared Lesson planning rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Lesson planning learner adaptation [LFT-003]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-003 static check 3 inspected the saved wording for “Lesson planning learner adaptation [LFT-003].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-003-S04, the declared Lesson planning rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Lesson planning evidence traceability [LFT-003]",
      "firstPass": true,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-003 static check 4 inspected the saved wording for “Lesson planning evidence traceability [LFT-003].” The first transcript contained enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-003-S04, the declared Lesson planning rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    },
    {
      "name": "Lesson planning safety and access [LFT-003]",
      "firstPass": false,
      "finalPass": true,
      "evidence": "LFT-003 static check 5 inspected the saved wording for “Lesson planning safety and access [LFT-003].” The first transcript did not contain enough support; the corrected transcript contained enough support. The comparison used only fictional fixture LFT-003-S04, the declared Lesson planning rules, and the record’s frozen text; no live outcome or external action counted as evidence."
    }
  ],
  "initialScore": 6,
  "score": 10,
  "verdict": "worked",
  "recommended": true,
  "whatWorked": [
    "LFT-003 kept “plan an inquiry lesson about ecosystems” bounded to disclosed fictional inputs and preserved an auditable first-response snapshot.",
    "LFT-003 made the central handling—compare S01/S02 with control C0, exclude LFT-003-S04 from the causal claim, and retain safety note Q2 before inviting a learner conclusion—inspectable rather than implying unseen work.",
    "LFT-003 earned final passes for Lesson planning objective fit [LFT-003] and Lesson planning content accuracy [LFT-003] under the same frozen scoring rules."
  ],
  "whatFailed": [
    "LFT-003’s first draft failed Lesson planning objective fit [LFT-003]; one correction repaired it, but the initial defect remains part of the published audit trail."
  ],
  "evidencePlan": "A curriculum-alignment checklist will verify objective coverage, activity feasibility, and assessment fit.",
  "evidenceNotes": [
    "LFT-003 preserves the exact synthetic prompt, frozen first-response account, failure-only correction, corrected-response account, and five boolean decisions together.",
    "LFT-003 scores are arithmetic: 3 first-pass checks × 2 = 6/10; 5 final-pass checks × 2 = 10/10.",
    "LFT-003 evaluated only the text/static portion of the declared evidence plan—A curriculum-alignment checklist will verify objective coverage, activity feasibility, and assessment fit.—and did not fabricate a live artifact, external validator, or observed outcome."
  ],
  "limitations": [
    "LFT-003 is a synthetic benchmark, so its worked verdict measures fit to the disclosed fictional Lesson planning fixtures rather than effectiveness in a real workplace or learning setting.",
    "LFT-003 used one text-only Codex multi-agent session whose underlying model identifier was not disclosed; different prompts, models, fixtures, or human reviewers could produce different results."
  ]
}